PERLOCUTIONARY INFLUENCE IN DIPLOMATIC COMMUNICATION: A COGNITIVE-PRAGMATIC ANALYSIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
The nature of perlocutionary communication is of particular interest within the pragmalinguistic paradigm with regard to this dissertation, and its importance as a pillar of diplomatic discourse. This research intends to explore in what linguistic and cognitive logics perlocutionary influence is produced, transmitted and processed. Building off the theoretical frameworks of speech act theory, psycholinguistic and discourse analytic concepts, this research explores how speakers produce communicative goals through their speeches in Uzbek and English diplomatic works. These empirical findings indicate that perlocutionary actions are governed by many linguistic, cognitive and socio-cultural variables that are necessary for accurate communication.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. R. (1979). Expression and meaning: Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 3, pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in interaction: An introduction to pragmatics. London: Longman.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Discourse as social interaction. London: Sage Publications.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman.
Wodak, R. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications.
Berridge, G. R. (2015). Diplomacy: Theory and practice (5th ed.). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sharp, P. (2009). Diplomatic theory of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurbalija, J. (2013). An introduction to diplomacy. Malta: DiploFoundation.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazykovoy krug: lichnost', kontsepty, diskurs. Volgograd: Peremena.
Safarov, Sh. (2008). Pragmalingvistika. Toshkent: Fan.
Mahmudov, N. (2010). Til va muloqot. Toshkent: Fan.