РОЛЬ ИСКУССТВЕННОГО ИНТЕЛЛЕКТА В ОПТИМИЗАЦИИ УЧЕБНОГО ПРОЦЕССА В МЕДИЦИНСКОМ ВУЗЕ
Ключевые слова:
искусственный интеллект, медицинское образование, адаптивное обучение, виртуальные пациенты, объективный структурированный клинический экзамен, академическая добросовестность, Университет 4.0..Аннотация
Статья посвящена системному анализу роли искусственного интеллекта в оптимизации учебного процесса в медицинском вузе с позиций стратегического управления высшей школой. Рассмотрены предпосылки перехода от лекционно-семинарской парадигмы к адаптивному обучению, возможности построения индивидуальных образовательных траекторий, применение больших языковых моделей и виртуальных пациентов в симуляционном обучении и автоматизации объективного структурированного клинического экзамена. На основе современных мета-аналитических данных показано статистически значимое улучшение усвоения знаний и удовлетворённости обучающихся при ИИ-ассистированном проблемно-ориентированном обучении. Обсуждаются риски «потёмкинской компетентности», вопросы институциональной этики, адаптации антиплагиат-систем и формирования цифровой культуры у студентов-медиков. Предложены стратегические ориентиры для администрации медицинских вузов в рамках концепции «Университет 4.0»..
Библиографические ссылки
Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 2024;46(4):446–470.
Sriram A, Ramachandran K, Krishnamoorthy S. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: Transforming Learning and Practice. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e80852.
Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: Potential Impact and Opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22–27.
Hallquist E, Gupta I, Montalbano M, Loukas M. Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2025;17(3):e79878.
Tozsin A, Ucmak H, Soyturk S, et al. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Systematic Review. Surg Innov. 2024;31(4):415–423.
Franco D'Souza R, Mathew M, Mishra V, Surapaneni KM. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a scoping review. Med Educ Online. 2024;29(1):2330250.
Weidener L, Fischer M. Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: an updated scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:1142.
Schuitmaker L, Drogt J, Benders M, et al. Physicians' required competencies in AI-assisted clinical settings: a systematic review. Br Med Bull. 2025;153(1):ldae025.
Gazquez-Garcia J, Sánchez-Bocanegra CL, Sevillano JL. AI in the Health Sector: Systematic Review of Key Skills for Future Health Professionals. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e58161.
Ali M. Navigating the integration of artificial intelligence in the medical education curriculum. Clin Teach. 2025;22(2):e70040.
Oftring ZS, Deutsch K, Tolks D, Jungmann F, Kuhn S. Novel Blended Learning on Artificial Intelligence for Medical Students: Qualitative Interview Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e63765.
Wei H, Dai Y, Yuan K, Li KY, Hung KF, Hu EM, et al. AI-Powered Problem- and Case-based Learning in Medical and Dental Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Int Dent J. 2025;75(4):100858.
Rani S, Kumari A, Ekka SC, et al. Perception of medical students and faculty regarding the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in medical education: a cross-sectional study. Cureus. 2025;17(1):e77514.
Civaner MM, Uncu Y, Bulut F, Chalil EG, Tatli A. Artificial intelligence in medical education: a cross-sectional needs assessment. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):772.
Masters K. Ethical use of artificial intelligence in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 158. Med Teach. 2023;45(6):574–578.
Pucchio A, Rathagirishnan R, Caton N, et al. Exploration of exposure to artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a Canadian cross-sectional mixed-methods study. BMC Med Educ. 2022;22(1):815.
Hamilton A. Artificial Intelligence and Healthcare Simulation: The Shifting Landscape of Medical Education. Cureus. 2024;16(5):e59747.
Fang Q, Reynaldi R, Araminta AS, et al. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-driven dental education: Exploring the role of chatbots in a clinical learning environment. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(6):1181–1188.
Lutz C, Hobson L, Rodgers D. Revolutionizing OSCE Preparation Through AI-Driven Synthetic Patients. Proc IMPRS. 2025;8(1):29650.
Kıyak YS, Emekli E. ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: a literature review. Postgrad Med J. 2024;100(1189):858–865.
Tekin M, Yurdal MO, Toraman Ç, Korkmaz G, Uysal İ. Is AI the future of evaluation in medical education? AI vs. human evaluation in objective structured clinical examination. BMC Med Educ. 2025;25:641.
Geathers J, Hicke Y, Chan C, et al. Benchmarking generative AI for scoring medical student interviews in objective structured clinical examinations. NPJ Digit Med. 2025;8(1):221.
Bicknell BT, Butler D, Whalen S, et al. ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e63430.
Knoedler L, Alfertshofer M, Knoedler S, et al. Pure wisdom or Potemkin villages? A comparison of ChatGPT 3.5 and ChatGPT 4 on USMLE Step 3 style questions: quantitative analysis. JMIR Med Educ. 2024;10:e51148.
Cheung BHH, Lau GKK, Wong GTC, et al. ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions — A multinational prospective study. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290691.
Penny S, Bhuyan N, Pierce J, Williams AR. Advancements in AI Medical Education: Assessing ChatGPT's Performance on USMLE-Style Questions Across Topics and Difficulty Levels. Cureus. 2024;16(12):e76309.
Brin D, Sorin V, Vaid A, et al. Comparing ChatGPT and GPT-4 performance in USMLE soft skill assessments. Sci Rep. 2023;13:16492.
Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLoS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198.
Garabet R, Mackey BP, Cross J, Weingarten M. ChatGPT-4 Performance on USMLE Step 1 Style Questions and Its Implications for Medical Education: A Comparative Study Across Systems and Disciplines. Med Sci Educ. 2024;34(1):145–152.
Fatima SS, Sheikh NA, Osama A. Authentic assessment in medical education: exploring AI integration and student-as-partners collaboration. Postgrad Med J. 2024;100(1190):959–967.
Schwartzstein RM. Clinical Reasoning and Artificial Intelligence: Can AI Really Think? Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 2024;134:133–145.
Jalali A, Harbi Houssein K, Fotsing S. Twelve Practical Tips for Integrating AI Into Medical Education. JMIR Med Educ. 2025;11:e81297.
Shimizu I, Kasai H, Shikino K, et al. Developing Medical Education Curriculum Reform Strategies to Address the Impact of Generative AI: Qualitative Study. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e53466.
Divito CB, Katchikian BM, Gruenwald JE, Burgoon JM. The tools of the future are the challenges of today: the use of ChatGPT in problem-based learning medical education. Med Teach. 2024;46(6):806–809.
Chinta SV, Wang Z, Palikhe A, et al. AI-driven healthcare: a review on ensuring fairness and mitigating bias. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4(5):e0000864.
Moorhouse BL, Yeo MA, Wan Y. Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world's top-ranking universities. Comput Educ Open. 2023;5:100151.
Tan TAL, Maravilla NMAT. Shaping integrity: why generative artificial intelligence does not have to undermine education. Front Educ. 2024;9:1471224.
Uribe SE, Maldupa I, Schwendicke F. Integrating Generative AI in Dental Education: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Recommendations. Eur J Dent Educ. 2025;29(2):341–355.
Chan CKY. A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2023;20:38.
Bittle K, El-Gayar O. Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review. Educ Sci. 2025;15(4):394.
Aydinlar A, Mavi A, Kütükçü E, et al. Awareness and level of digital literacy among students receiving health-based education. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:38.
Haider SA, Borna S, Gomez-Cabello CA, et al. The algorithmic divide: a systematic review on AI-driven racial disparities in healthcare. PLOS Digit Health. 2025;4(6):e0000892.
Salih SM, Elnimeiri MK, Ahmed MH. Toward an AI-literate medical faculty: designing faculty development programmes. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24:1487.
Хуррамов, Ф. ., & Нурмаматов, Д. (2026). PROMPT ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE: HARASSING THE POTENTIAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, EDUCATION, AND RESEARCH. Eurasian Journal of Medical and Natural Sciences, 6(4 Part 2), 14–24. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJMNS/article/view/80086
