COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICS IN THE DIGITAL AGE: COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS FOR LANGUAGE COMPARISON
Abstrak
This article explores how comparative linguistics has evolved in the digital age through the use of computational tools. It discusses major resources such as linguistic databases, algorithms for phonetic alignment, and visualization technologies. Applications in language reconstruction, historical linguistics, and preservation of endangered languages are examined, along with the challenges of data reliability and algorithmic bias. The article concludes that while computational methods expand the scope of comparative linguistics, human expertise remains essential.
Iqtiboslar
• Bouckaert, R., Lemey, P., Dunn, M., Greenhill, S. J., Alekseyenko, A. V., Drummond, A. J., … & Atkinson, Q. D. (2012). Mapping the origins and expansion of the Indo-European language family. Science, 337(6097), 957–960.
• Haspelmath, M., & Dryer, M. S. (Eds.). (2005). The World Atlas of Language Structures. Oxford University Press.
• List, J. M., Greenhill, S. J., & Gray, R.
D. (2017). The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0170046.
• Wichmann, S., Holman, E. W., & Brown, C. H. (2010). The ASJP database (version 13). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.
• Zeman, D., & Resnik, P. (2020). Computational historical linguistics: Successes, challenges, and perspectives. Journal of Language Modelling, 8(2), 345–372.
