METHODOLOGY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING OF STUDENTS USING VIRTUAL LABORATORIES
Keywords:
Virtual laboratories, Professional training, Methodology, Students, Development, Implementation, Active learning, Experiential learning, Safety, Cost-effectiveness, assessment, Design and development, Integration and implementation, Assessment and evaluation, Technological infrastructure, Instructor training and support, Student engagement and motivation, Scalability and sustainability, Challenges, Future directions, Authenticity and realism, Assessment methods, Continuous improvement.Abstract
Virtual laboratories have emerged as powerful educational tools for enhancing professional training in various disciplines. This scientific article explores the methodology for developing and implementing virtual laboratories to facilitate the professional training of students. It highlights the benefits of virtual laboratories, discusses the key components of the methodology, and presents practical considerations for their effective integration into educational programs. The article emphasizes the role of virtual laboratories in promoting active learning, skills development, and the acquisition of practical knowledge. Furthermore, it addresses the challenges and opportunities associated with the implementation of virtual laboratories in professional training. By adopting this methodology, educators can create immersive and interactive learning environments that prepare students for the demands of their future professions.
References
Sun, X.; Bao, J.; Li, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhou, B. A digital twin-driven approach for the assembly-commissioning of high precision products. Robot. Comput. Manuf. 2020, 61, 101839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Tao, F.; Sui, F.; Liu, A.; Qi, Q.; Zhang, M.; Song, B.; Guo, Z.; Lu, S.C.; Nee, A.Y. Nee Digital twin-driven product design framework. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2018, 59, 3935–3953. [Google Scholar]
Schmetz, A.; Lee, T.H.; Hoeren, M.; Berger, M.; Ehret, S.; Zontar, D.; Min, S.-H.; Ahn, S.-H.; Brecher, C. Evaluation of industry 4.0 data formats for digital twin of optical components. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. Technol. 2020, 7, 573–584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Dietz, M.; Pernul, G. Digital twin: Empowering enterprises towards a system-of-systems approach. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2019, 62, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Ríos, J.; Hernández, J.C.; Oliva, M.; Mas, F. Product avatar as digital counterpart of a physical individual product: Literature review and implications in an aircraft. Adv. Transdiscipl. Eng. 2015, 2, 657–666. [Google Scholar]
Zieringer, C.; Bauer, B.; Stache, N.C.; Wittenberg, C. Human-Robot Interaction Via a Virtual Twin and OPC UA. In Proceedings of the Software Engineering in Intelligent Systems; Springer Science and Business Media LLC: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; pp. 101–107. [Google Scholar]
Kim, D.; Jeong, Y.-C.; Park, C.; Shin, A.; Min, K.W.; Jo, S.; Kim, D. Interactive virtual objects attract attention and induce exploratory behaviours in rats. Behav. Brain Res. 2020, 392, 112737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
