COMMUNICATIVE FUNCTIONS OF ANTHROPONYMS IN LITERARY TEXT
Keywords:
Anthroponym, linguopragmatics, pragmatics, onomastics, Uzbek literature, communication.Abstract
This article explores the linguopragmatic characteristics of anthroponyms using texts from contemporary Uzbek literature. Anthroponyms, beyond their nominal function, carry expressive and cultural meanings in literary contexts. The study demonstrates how names used by author Erkin A’zam serve communicative and stylistic functions, reflecting characters’ social identities, emotional nuances, and authorial intentions. The research highlights the necessity of contextual and pragmatic approaches in analyzing literary onomastics.
References
A’zam Erkin. Chapaklar yoki Chalpaklar mamlakati.-G‘.G‘ulom nomidagi adabiyot va san’at nashriyoti, 2021.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, D. (1997). A Dictionary of Linguistics and Phonetics (4th ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Karasik, V. I. (2002). Yazyk sotsial’noy pozitsii. Volgograd: Peremena.
Karimov, F. (2018). O‘zbek tilida antroponimik birliklar va ularning lingvopragmatik xususiyatlari. Toshkent: Fan.
Ko‘zimov, O. (2002). O‘zbek tilining onomastikasi. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston fanlar akademiyasi.
Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rahmonov, A. (2015). Til va pragmatika. Toshkent: O‘zbekiston Milliy ensiklopediyasi nashriyoti.
Rakhimov, S. (2019). Til va kontekst: lingvopragmatik izlanishlar. Samarqand: Registon.cn
Tursunov, A. (2011). O‘zbek antroponimiyasining asosiy masalalari. Toshkent: O‘z bekiston Milliy universiteti.
