INVESTITSIYA ABITRAJIDA QARSHI DA’VO INSTITUTINING QONUN USTUVORLIGI TA’MINLASHDAGI O’RNI.
Abstrak
Mazkur maqolada investitsiya arbitrajida qarshi da’voni qo’llash uchun ehtiyojlar, mahalliy sudlarda mavjud bo’lgan cheklovlar,investitsiya arbitrajida bu mexanizimni qo’llashning huquqiy oqibatlari hamda qonun ustuvorligini ta’minlashda o’rni muhokama qilingan.
Iqtiboslar
UN Secretary-General, The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and PostConflict Societies, UN Doc. S/2004/616 para. 6 (Aug. 23, 2004);
Kryvoi, Yaraslau, "Counterclaims in Investor-State Arbitration" (2012).Minnesota
Journal of International Law. https://scholarship.law.umn.edu/mjil/321;
“The Role of Counterclaims in Investment Arbitration” by Markus Burgstaller and
Alexander A. Reinisch, is an academic article that explores the benefits and drawbacks of
counterclaims in investment arbitration;
W. Michael Reisman, International Investment Arbitration and ADR, 24(1) ICSID REV.
(2009);
Human Rights Council, Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human
Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises –
Zero Draft (July 16, 2018);
Human Rights Council, Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human
Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises –
Zero Draft (July 16, 2018);
For a comparative institutional analysis between investment law and other
adjudicatory and nonadjudicatory mechanisms including domestic dispute settlement
mechanisms, Sergio Puig & Gregory Shaffer, Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and
the Reform of Investment Law, 112 AJIL 361 (2018);`
Lise Johnson & Brooke Skartvedt Guven, The Settlement of Investment Disputes: A
Discussion of Democratic Accountability and the Public Interest, 8(1) Investment Treaty News
(2017);
Tom Ginsburg, International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment
Treaties and Governance, 25 Int'l Rev. L. & Econ. 107, 123 (2005);
UN Human Rights Comm., General Comment No. 31, Nature of the General Legal
Obligation Imposed on States Parties to the Covenant, UN Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.13
para. 8 (May 26, 2004);
https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/67/1 ;
The membership of the Convention of 30 June 2005 on Choice of Court Agreements is
limited to the European Union and its member states, Mexico, Montenegro, and Singapore (as
of Nov. 29, 2018);
Susan D. Franck, Foreign Direct Investment, Investment Treaty Arbitration, and the
Rule of Law, 19 Global Bus. & Dev. L.J. 337, 372 (2007) .
