COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE ABUTMENT–GINGIVA INTERFACE USING VARIOUS SURFACE TREATMENT METHODS
Keywords:
Implant, abutment, gingiva, porcelain, ceramic, sandblasting, microscope, epithelial attachmentAbstract
In modern dental implantology, improving the quality of the abutment–gingiva interface is of great importance. Proper surface treatment of the abutment–gingival junction helps create a strong and biologically compatible connection with the gingiva, which ensures the long-term success of the implant and prevents inflammation of the surrounding soft tissues. An ideal abutment–gingiva interface is crucial not only for mechanical stability but also for maintaining the aesthetic and functional condition of the soft tissues. Therefore, a detailed investigation of the influence of various surface treatment methods on this interface is necessary. Today, mechanical, chemical, and plasma surface treatment methods are widely used. However, comparative studies evaluating their effectiveness remain insufficient. This study is of practical relevance in the field of implantology and prosthetic dentistry, aiming to improve the quality of the abutment–gingiva interface and thus enhance the longevity of dental implants. The results of the comparative evaluation will assist dental professionals in selecting appropriate abutment treatment methods, helping to preserve the integrity of the gingiva and surrounding soft tissues, reduce infectious complications, and achieve superior aesthetic outcomes.
References
Albrektsson, T., & Wennerberg, A. (2004). Oral implant surfaces: Part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 17(5), 536–543.
Anil, S., Anand, P. S., Alghamdi, H., & Jansen, J. A. (2011). Dental implant surface enhancement and osseointegration. Implant Dentistry, 20(2), 111–121.
Apaza-Bedoya, K., et al. (2017). Bioactive surfaces for soft tissue integration in dental implants. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 76, 1112–1126.
Buser, D., et al. (1992). Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 3(1), 22–32.
Cochran, D. L., et al. (1998). Evaluation of dental implant interface with connective tissue: A review. Journal of Periodontology, 69(11), 1137–1145.
Dhir, S. (2013). Surface modifications in endosseous dental implants. Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology, 17(6), 798–802.
Elias, C. N., et al. (2008). Biomedical applications of titanium and its alloys. JOM, 60(3), 46–49.
Gittens, R. A., et al. (2014). The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the biological response to implant materials. Biomaterials Science, 2(2), 202–218.
Grusovin, M. G., et al. (2007). Short implants versus long implants in augmented bone. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3.
Hall, J., et al. (2011). The effect of titanium surface roughness on the growth of human gingival fibroblasts. Journal of Periodontology, 82(3), 440–447.
He, F. M., et al. (2009). Surface roughness, cell response and osseointegration of sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B, 93(1), 325–331.
Hosseini, M., & Worsaae, N. (2012). Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Periodontology 2000, 59(1), 199–214.
Ivanovski, S., & Lee, R. (2018). Comparison of peri-implant and periodontal marginal soft tissues. Periodontology 2000, 76(1), 116–130.
John, G., Becker, J., & Schwarz, F. (2019). Impact of different abutment and implant materials on peri-implant soft-tissue integration: A systematic review. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 30(8), 840–850.
Jung, R. E., et al. (2008). Effect of implant design and surface on bone regeneration. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 19(1), 119–130.
Kang, B. S., et al. (2008). Enhanced osteoblast response to hydrophilic sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surfaces. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 86(1), 265–273.
Linkevicius, T., et al. (2015). Soft tissue thickness as a predictor of crestal bone changes. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(9), 999–1006.
Matsuo, K., et al. (2016). Effects of implant surface roughness and topography on the behavior of soft tissue cells. Journal of Oral Biosciences, 58(3), 101–108.
Misch, C. E. (2015). Dental Implant Prosthetics (2nd ed.). Mosby Elsevier.
Monje, A., et al. (2019). Peri-implant soft tissue integration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 46(Suppl 21), 45–66.
Nishimura, I., et al. (2008). Biocompatibility of titanium implants. Journal of Dental Research, 87(6), 519–523.
Novaes, A. B., et al. (2010). Soft tissue integration with different implant abutment materials. Journal of Periodontology, 81(5), 748–757.
Oh, T. J., et al. (2002). Significance of the biologic width on implant dentistry. Journal of Periodontology, 73(2), 164–171.
Pjetursson, B. E., et al. (2012). A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23(6), 22–38.
Rupp, F., et al. (2006). Enhancing surface free energy and hydrophilicity of titanium implant materials. Biomaterials, 27(32), 5632–5639.
Schwarz, F., et al. (2013). Peri-implant soft tissue integration. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 40(12), 132–144.
Souza, J. C., et al. (2015). Titanium surface modification for enhanced bioactivity. Materials Science and Engineering: C, 56, 538–551.
Suárez-López Del Amo, F., et al. (2016). Soft tissue enhancement around dental implants. Journal of Periodontology, 87(4), 495–505.
Wennerberg, A., & Albrektsson, T. (2009). Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 20(S4), 172–184.
Zitzmann, N. U., & Berglundh, T. (2008). Definition and prevalence of peri-implant diseases. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 35(Suppl. 8), 286–291.
Abrahamsson, I., & Berglundh, T. (2006). Tissue characteristics at microthreaded implants: An experimental study in dogs. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 8(3), 107–113.
Canullo, L., et al. (2014). Soft tissue response to different abutment materials and designs. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(9), 1045–1050.
Le Guéhennec, L., et al. (2007). Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dental Materials, 23(7), 844–854.
Quirynen, M., et al. (2002). The clinical impact of the surface roughness of oral implants. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 13(3), 229–238.
Trisi, P., & Rao, W. (1999). Bone classification: Clinical-histomorphometric comparison. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 10(1), 1–7.
