ASSESSMENT OF THE HEALTH OF CHILDREN BORN WITH ASSISTED REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract:
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) are an important tool for overcoming infertility, but their impact on the health of the offspring remains a subject of scientific debate. The aim of this study is to analyze current data on the health of children born through ART, including physical, somatic, cognitive, and mental development. The article examines the characteristics of pregnancy, perinatal outcomes, the incidence of congenital anomalies, and long-term health consequences. A comparative analysis of children conceived naturally and through ART was conducted. It was found that most children born through ART have health indicators comparable to those of the general population; however, certain risks associated with parental health factors and pregnancy characteristics remain
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Jackson R.A., Gibson K.A., Wu Y.W. et al. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 3: 551—563.
Healy D.L., Breheny S., Halliday J. et al. Prevalence and risk factors for obstetric haemorrhage in 6730 singleton births after assisted reproductive technology in Victoria Australia. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 1: 265—274.
Romundstad L.B., Romundstad P.R., Sunde A. et al. Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study. Lancet 2008; 372: 737—743.
Hansen M., Bower C., Milne E. et al. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects-a systematic review. Hum Reprod 2005; 20: 2: 328—338.
Davies M.J., Moore V.M., Willson K.J. et al. Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 19: 1803—1813.
Wen J., Jiang J., Ding C. et al. Birth defects in children conceived by in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 6: 1331—1337.
Neelanjana M, Sabaratnam А. Malignant conditions in children born after assisted reproductive technology. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2008; 63 (10): 669–676.
Bowdin S, Allen C, Kirby G, et al. A survey of assisted reproductive technology births and imprinting disorders. Hum. Reprod. 2007; 22 (12): 3237–3240.
Соловьева Е.В. Особенности развития детей, зачатых при помощи вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Современная зарубежная психология. 2014; 3 (4): 33–47.
Орлова О.С., Печенина В.А. Особенности речевого развития детей-близнецов, родившихся в результате вспомогательных репродуктивных технологий. Специальное образование. 2014; 4: 50–54.
Rimm A, Katayma A, Diaz M, Katayama K. A metaanalysis of controlled studies comparing major malformation rates in IVF and ICSI infants with naturally conceived children. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2004; 21: 437–443.
Ericson A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: A population-based study. Human Reproduction. 2001; 16: 504–509