DESIGN OF PHYSICS LESSONS IN THE CLIL ENVIRONMENT: INNOVATIVE APPROACHES AND RESULTS
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstrak:
This study examines the application of CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) technology in physics lessons in higher education. The purpose of the study is to develop learning strategies based on CLIL and assess their impact on improving the learning outcomes and academic language skills of undergraduate students. The research was conducted on the basis of a mixed methodology with university students. Data were collected through pre-test and post-test, lesson observations, and student surveys. The results showed that classes based on CLIL technology significantly improve students' understanding of physics, motivation, and academic communication. The research results confirm that CLIL technology is an effective pedagogical approach to the modernization of physics education in higher education.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##submission.howToCite##:
##submission.citations##:
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge University Press.
Dalton-Puffer, C. (2011). Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 182–204.
Ball, P., Kelly, K., & Clegg, J. (2015). Putting CLIL into Practice. Oxford University Press.
Marsh, D. (2002). CLIL/EMILE – The European Dimension: Actions, Trends and Foresight Potential. European Commission.
Lyster, R., & Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302.
Mehisto, P., Marsh, D., & Frigols, M. J. (2008). Uncovering CLIL: Content and Language Integrated Learning in Bilingual and Multilingual Education. Macmillan Education.
Nikula, T. (2010). CLIL and the quality of learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13(3), 289–302.
Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2015). CLIL: Bilingual Education in Context. Applied Linguistics Review, 6(3), 1–27.
Massler, U. (2012). Integrating CLIL into higher education physics teaching. Journal of Physics Education, 49(4), 243–251.
Nikula, T., Moore, P., & van Camp, R. (2016). Language Awareness in CLIL and Content Learning. Routledge.
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543–562.
Gajo, L. (2007). Learning Science in a Second Language: CLIL in Higher Education. International Journal of Science Education, 29(5), 1237–1255.
Nikula, T. (2010). CLIL in Finnish upper secondary schools: Results and reflections. Language Learning Journal, 38(2), 179–195.
Dalton-Puffer, C., & Smit, U. (2007). Content-and-language integrated learning: A study of classroom discourse. Language Learning Journal, 35(1), 3–24.
Mehisto, P. (2012). CLIL in Higher Education: Principles and Practice. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 33(5), 451–468.
Ball, P., & Kelly, K. (2011). CLIL: An Introduction. Oxford University Press.
Nikula, T. (2013). Teacher and learner perspectives in CLIL classrooms: Evidence from Finnish universities. Bilingual Research Journal, 36(3), 268–285.
Massler, U., & Meyer, H. (2014). The effect of CLIL on science learning in higher education. European Journal of Physics Education, 5(2), 105–120.
