SUN’IY INTELLEKT TOMONIDAN YARATILGAN IXTIROLARGA PATENT BERISH MASALASI: JAR VA O‘ZBEKISTON QIYOSIY TAHLILI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
Mazkur maqolada sun’iy intellekt tizimlari tomonidan mustaqil yaratilgan ixtirolarni patentlash masalasi intellektual mulk huquqi nuqtayi nazaridan tadqiq etilgan. Xususan, an’anaviy patent tizimining inson ixtirochiligiga asoslangan modeli sun’iy intellekt ixtirolarini huquqiy e’tirof etishda yetarli emasligi tahlil qilinadi. Tadqiqot doirasida Janubiy Afrika Respublikasining DABUS sun’iy intellekt tizimi yaratgan ixtiroga patent bergan birinchi davlat sifatidagi tajribasi o‘rganilib, ushbu yondashuvning afzallik va risklari yoritib berilgan. Shuningdek, Yevropa Ittifoqi, AQSH, Buyuk Britaniya, Avstraliya, Singapur va Koreya Respublikasining sun’iy intellekt ixtirolariga yondashuvi qiyosiy tahlil qilingan. Tadqiqot yakunida O‘zbekiston uchun bosqichma-bosqich islohot modelini joriy etish, qonunchilikka sun’iy intellekt ixtirolarini patentlashga oid normalar kiritish, ixtisoslashgan ekspert institutini shakllantirish va xalqaro amaliyotga integratsiyalashuvga qaratilgan ilmiy-amaliy tavsiyalar ishlab chiqilgan..
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Abbott, Ryan Benjamin, I Think, Therefore I Invent: Creative Computers and the Future of Patent Law. Boston College Law Review, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2727884 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2727884
Erica Fraser, Computers as Inventors – Legal and Policy Implications of Artificial Intelligence on Patent Law (2016) 13:3 SCRIPTed 305 https://script-ed.org/?p=3195
The official website: Companies and Intellectual Property Commission of South Africa. Patent Application ZA2021/03242. July 28, 2021. Available at: https://www.cipc.co.za
“Raqamli Oʻzbekiston — 2030” strategiyasini tasdiqlash va uni samarali amalga oshirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisidagi PF-6079-son // Qonun hujjatlari maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 01.03.2025-y., 06/25/27/0196-son, https://lex.uz/docs/-5030957
Sunʼiy intellekt texnologiyalarini 2030-yilga qadar rivojlantirish strategiyasini tasdiqlash toʻgʻrisida PQ-358-son Qaror // Qonunchilik maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 27.10.2025-y., 06/25/189/0978-son, https://lex.uz/docs/-7158604
Kim Daria. AI-Generated Inventions: Time to Get the Record Straight on Exclusion and Inventorship. GRUR International 69, no. 5 (2020): 443-456. // available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342023761_'AI-Generated_Inventions'_Time_to_Get_the_Record_Straight
Guadamuz, Andres, Do Androids Dream of Electric Copyright? Comparative Analysis of Originality in Artificial Intelligence Generated Works (June 5, 2020). Intellectual Property Quarterly, 2017 (2), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2981304
The official website: European Patent Office. Decision of 27 January 2020 on EP 18 275 163 and EP 18 275 174. Available at: https://www.epo.org
Yanisky-Ravid, Shlomit, Generating Rembrandt: Artificial Intelligence, Copyright, and Accountability in the 3A Era — The Human-Like Authors Are Already Here — A New Model (April 24, 2017). Michigan State Law Review, Award Winning: The 2017 Visionary Article in Intellectual Property Law, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2957722 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2957722
Republic of South Africa. Patents Act 57 of 1978. Government Gazette, May 2, 1978: Section 25. // available at: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201504/act-57-1978.pdf
The official website: World Intellectual Property Organization. The WIPO Conversation on Intellectual Property and Artificial Intelligence //Available at: https://www.wipo.int/en/web/frontier-technologies/artificial-intelligence/
conversation
Yu, Peter. Artificial Intelligence, the Law-Machine Interface, and Fair Use Automation. Alabama Law Review 72, no. 1 (2020): 187-242. // available at: https://law.ua.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/4-Yu-187-238.pdf
Ncube, Caroline B., Calibrating Copyright for Creators and Consumers: Promoting Distributive Justice and Ubuntu (August 24, 2016). R. Giblin & K. Weatherall (eds.), What if We Could Reimagine Copyright?, Canberra: ANU Press, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2828616
O'zbekiston Respublikasi Ixtirolar, foydali modellar va sanoat namunalari toʻgʻrisidagi Qonuni // Qonunchilik maʼlumotlari milliy bazasi, 09.08.2025-y., 03/25/1080/0710-son ; https://lex.uz/uz/docs/-76671
O‘zbekistonda sun’iy intellekt haqida qonun qabul qilinmoqda. Unda nima yozilgan? 15.04.2025. Farrux Absattarov // available at: https://kun.uz/news/2025/04/15/ozbekistonda-suniy-intellekt-haqida-qonun-qabul-qilinmoqda-unda-nima-yozilgan
The official website: United States Patent and Trademark Office. Decision on Petition in re Application 16/524,350. April 22, 2020. Available at: https://www.uspto.gov/sites/default/files/documents/16524350_22apr2020.pdf
The official website: USPTO. USPTO releases report on artificial intelligence and intellectual property policy October 2020. Available at: https://www.uspto.gov/about-us/news-updates/uspto-releases-report-artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property
The official website: UK Supreme Court. Thaler v Comptroller-General of Patents. UKSC 61, December 20, 2023. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2021-0201
UK Intellectual Property Office. Patents Act 1977: Guidance on AI Inventorship. Updated January 2024 // available at: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1977/37/contents
The official website: Federal Court of Australia. Commissioner of Patents v Thaler. FCAFC 62, April 13, 2022. Available at: https://business.cch.com/ipld/AustraliaCommissionerThaler202200413.pdf
Lee, Jyh-An. Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property in Asia. Asian Journal of Law and Society 8, no. 2 (2021): 234-256.
Dornis, Tim W., Artificial Intelligence and Innovation: The End of Patent Law As We Know It (August 5, 2020). Yale Journal of Law & Technology, vol. XXIII, pp. 97 (2020), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3668137 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3668137
Lemley, Mark A., IP in a World Without Scarcity (March 24, 2014). Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 2413974, 90 New York University Law Review 460 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2413974 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2413974
Samuelson, Pamela. Allocating Ownership Rights in Computer-Generated Works. University of Pittsburgh Law Review 47, no. 4 (1986): 1185-1228. // available at: https://www.law.berkeley.edu/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Pam-Samuelson-Allocating-Ownership-Rights-in-Computer-Generated-Works.pdf
Selbst, Andrew D., Negligence and AI's Human Users (March 11, 2019). 100 Boston University Law Review 1315 (2020), UCLA School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 20-01, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3350508
Scherer, Matthew U., Regulating Artificial Intelligence Systems: Risks, Challenges, Competencies, and Strategies (May 30, 2015). Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, Vol. 29, No. 2, Spring 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2609777 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2609777
Acemoglu, Daron and Autor, David H. and Hazell, Jonathon and Restrepo, Pascual, AI and Jobs: Evidence from Online Vacancies (December 2020). NBER Working Paper No. w28257, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3765910