THE STATUS OF POLYFUNCTIONAL WORDS IN THE LANGUAGE SYSTEM

Article Sidebar

Eurasian Journal of Academic Research
PDF
Issue: Vol. 4 No. 12 Special Issue : The development of science: Issues, solutions and prospects II traditional international scientific-practical conference
Section: Articles
Published:
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Main Article Content

shairaxan2015@gmail.com

Abstract:

Different approaches to the description of linguistic units, in particular, service words are being examined. The author substantiates the status of polyfunctional function words as a special class, identifies the criteria for including units in this class.


The status of polyfunctional words as a special class is substantiated. The principles of description system of polyfunctionality, service words on on the basis of polyfunctionality/ polysemantics/monosemantics. It has been established that the proposed approach allows describing other units of the language system (service and full denominative), which meets the need for an integrative description of the language system.

Keywords:

Article Details

How to Cite:

Xonboboeva, S. . (2025). THE STATUS OF POLYFUNCTIONAL WORDS IN THE LANGUAGE SYSTEM. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 4(12 Special Issue), 301–305. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejar/article/view/45141

References:

Vsevolodova M.V. Theory of functional and communicative syntax: a textbook. M., 2000.502 pp.

Litvin F.A. Polysemy and homonymy of syntactic words // Syntactic words. Novosibirsk, 1987. P.76-83.

Gak V.G. A word // Linguistic encyclopedic dictionary. M., 1990. P. 466.

Gladrov V. What are structural words? On the problem of parts of speech as a problem of interconditionality of language levels: materials of the II International congress of specialists in Russian philology «The Russian language: historical destinies and the present». M., 2004. P. 218-219.

Leykina B.M. Some functions of the word «and» // Linguistic problems of functional modeling of speech activity. L. 1979. Issue 4. P. 38-46.

Kim O.M. Transposition at the level of parts of speech and the homonymy phenomenon in modern Russian. Tashkent, 1978. 227 pp.

Punkov F.I. System of categorial classes of words in the Russian language (on the problem of grammatical classifications of lexicon) // Лінгвістичні student і ї: зб. sciences. праць / укл.: Anatol_y Zagn_tko (sciences. edition) that ін. Donetsk, 2006. Issue 14. P. 103-111.

Punkov F.I. Functional and communicative grammar of the Russian adverb: Diss. abstract for the Dr. of Philology degree. M., 2009. 44 pp.

See, for example, Shkhapatseva M.Kh. A compound sentence as a special structural and semantic type in the Russian and Adyghe languages // The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series «Philology and the Arts». 2012. Issue 3; Bedanokova S.K. Pragmatical functions of the conjunction «si» in a dialogue // The Bulletin of the Adyghe State University. Series «Philology and the Arts». 2013. Issue 1.

Nurmonov A. O‘zbek tilshunosligi tarixi. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 2002.

V.V. Vinogradov Leksikologiya i leksikografiya izbranniye trudi.- Мoskva, 1977.

Cheremisina M.I. Sravnitelniye konstruktsii ruskogo yazika. – Moskva, 1976.

Мirtojiyev М. Semasiologiya. – Тоshkent: Mumtoz soz, 2010.

Vinogradov V.V. Оsnovniye tipi leksicheskix znacheniy slova // Voprosi yazikoznaniya. – 1953.

Кrivonosov А.Т. Filosofiya yazika. - Moskva, 2012.

Qodirova N.A. O ‘zbek tilidagi affikslarda polifunksionallik: Filol. fan. nomz. diss. avtoref. – Toshkent, 2002;

Sulaymonova G.A. O ‘zbek tilida ot turkumidagi so‘zlarning polifunksionalligi: Filol. fan. nomz. diss. avtoref. – Toshkent, 2010.

Mirtojiyev M. O ‘zbek tili semasiologiyasi. - Toshkent: Mumtoz so‘z, 2010.

Eltazarov J.D So‘z turkumlari paradigmasidagi o‘zaro aloqa va ko‘chish. Monografiya. Toshkent, 2005.

Botirova A. O’zbek tilida so‘z turkumlarining birlamchi va ikkilamchi vazifasining funksional-sintaktik tahlili: Filol.fanlari bo‘yicha falsafa dok. Diss. Aftorefarat. Qarshi, 2018.

Bakhodir T., Amonturdiyev N. R. LEXICO-SEMANTIC FEATURES OF TRADER SPEECH //Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. – 2022. – Т. 3. – №. 5. – С. 2122-2125.

Rakhimova Z. S. ARGO AS A SOCIALLY LIMITED LEXICAL UNIT //CURRENT RESEARCH JOURNAL OF PHILOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2767-3758). – 2021. – Т. 2. – №. 12. – С. 146-150.

Rashidovich, Amonturdiyev Nurali. "LINGUISTIC STUDY OF MERCHANT SPEECH." (2022).

Wang, L. & Guo, Y. (2018). Polyfunctionality Studies in German, Dutch, English and Chinese. In: L. Wang, R. Köhler & A. Tuzzi (eds.), Structure, Function and Process in Texts. Germany: RAM-Verlag, 55−66.

Zawada, B. (2005). Linguistic creativity and mental representation with reference to intercategorial polysemy. University of South Africa.