GENERAL DIRECTIONS OF METAPHORIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH FIGURATIVE WORLDVIEW

Main Article Content

Karjawbaev Orazali Esbosin uli
Toleubayeva A.O

Аннотация:





This article argues that a more precise definition of the subject of study would be beneficial for metaphor research. There are three distinct ways to do metaphor research: as a component of grammar or use, as a component of language or cognition, or as a component of sign systems or behavior. Eight separate study domains that each have their own assumptions about metaphorical meaning and their own implications and repercussions for the goals and assessment of research arise when these three dimensions are crossed. These distinctions are supposed to make statements regarding the use of conceptual metaphor in language more credible.





Article Details

Как цитировать:

Karjawbaev , O. ., & Toleubayeva , . A. (2024). GENERAL DIRECTIONS OF METAPHORIZATION ASSOCIATED WITH FIGURATIVE WORLDVIEW. Журнал академических исследований нового Узбекистана, 1(3), 104–107. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/yoitj/article/view/29160

Библиографические ссылки:

Aitchison, Jean. (1999). Linguistics. 5th ed. London: Teach Yourself Books.

Branden, John. (2009). “Metaphor and Context: A Perspective from Artificial Intelligence.” In Metaphor and Discourse, ed. Andreas Musolff and Jorg Zinken. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Martinich, A.P., 1984, “A Theory for Metaphor,” Journal of Literary Semantics.

Montague, Richard, 1974, Formal Philosophy; Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Richmond H. Thomason (ed.), New Haven: Yale University Press.

Moran, Richard, 1989, “Seeing and Believing: Metaphor, Image, and Force,” Critical Inquiry.