THE SIGNIFICANCE OF CLASSIFICATION OF CORPORATE DISPUTES
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This article examines the different types of classification of shareholders in the context of corporate disputes, including majority and minority shareholders, as well as common and preferred shareholders. The article also discusses the various methods that can be employed to prevent such disputes, including implementing clear shareholder agreements, effective communication between shareholders and management, and utilizing dispute resolution mechanisms. The article emphasizes the importance of addressing shareholder disputes promptly and fairly to ensure the long-term success and stability of the corporation. To achieve this, the experience of other countries including the UK and Germany are compared from a point of legal view.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=a1a3edad-e776-4324-a585-079112ff49d5
Cahn, A., & Donald, D. (2018). References. In Comparative Company Law: Text and Cases on the Laws Governing Corporations in Germany, the UK and the USA (pp. 1014-1034). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Raymond Shonholtz, General Theory on Disputes and Conflicts, A, 2003 J. Disp. Resol. (2003) https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2003/iss2/6
Abdusaidovich K. A. Investigation of theatricalities of thefts and robberies on motor vehicles //Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research (AJMR). – 2019. – Т. 8. – №. 11. – С. 109-114.
“Jay Adkisson and Christopher M. Riser Shareholder Disputes in Close Corporations”.
Article 30 of the Economic Procedural Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan
Esenbekova F. T. et al. Features of the approval of the world agreement by the economic court: practice and theory //International Journal of Professional Science. – 2021. – №. 5. – С. 90-96.
Laptev VA Concept of corporate conflicts. Differentiation between the concepts of "corporate conflict" and " corporate dispute", "corporate takeover" and "corporate takeover" // Arbitration and civil process. – 2010. – no. 9. - S. 28-32.
Khakberdiev A. The concepts of criminal staging, its elements, methods of Detection and investigation N //Review of law sciences. – 2020. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 1.
O.S. Erahtina Preventive Measures for Minimization of Corporative Conflicts Perm University Bulletinn 2010 Legal Sciences Issue 3(9) 103 UDC 346.2
Corporate Disputes: Their Concept, Types And Specific Aspects Of Their Consideration In Court [Text]: A Practical Guide For Judges And Residents / M.Saidov. - Tashkent:, 2019. - 196 P
Kochutov Maria Konstantinovna Types of Corporate Disputes, Russian State University of Justice, Number: 57 Year: 2019 P- 15-17, UDC: 347.918
Abdusaidovich K. A. The theoretical basis for the classification of criminal dramatization, methods for their identification and investigation //International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. – 2020. – Т. 24. – №. 8. – С. 1930-1945.
Christoph Paulus "Shareholder Dispute Resolution in Germany"
Xakberdiev A. A. ARBITRATION COURT: SOME ISSUES OF LAW PROTECTION //World Bulletin of Management and Law. – 2021. – Т. 4. – С. 9-12.
Boyko T. Protection of the rights and interests of minority participants in a non-public company in the law of Russia, USA and UK. – Literes, 2021.
https://www.summitlawllp.co.uk/common-types-of-shareholder-dispute/
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Goldberg [2004]
Finch, V. (1990). Disqualification of Directors: A Plea for Competence. The Modern Law Review, 53(3), 385–391. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1096480
Meinhard v. Salmon, 164 N.E. 545, 546 (N.Y. 1928) (quoting Chief Justice Cardozo)
Khakberdiev A. A. PROSPECTS OF IMPROVING ARBITRATION COURTS AS ONE OF THE METHODS OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN UZBEKISTAN //Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 77-88.
Directors, fiduciary duty and the burden of proof Christopher Brockman of the Guildhall Chambers Insolvency Team January 2017 Edition
Vann, V. (2006). Causation And Breach of Fiduciary Duty. Singapore Journal Of Legal Studies, 86–107. Http://Www.Jstor.Org/Stable/24869218
Khakberdiev A. A. WAYS OF IMPROVING ARBITRATION COURTS IN UZBEKISTAN //INTELLECTUAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGICAL SOLUTIONS AND INNOVATIVE DIGITAL TOOLS. – 2023. – Т. 2. – №. 14. – С. 75-81.
Хакбердиев А. А. Ўғирлик ва талончиликка таълуқли бўлган инсценировкани тергов қилиш //журнал правовых исследований. – 2020. – Т. 5. – №. 1.
Ibratova F., Azamatov A., Yuldoshev A., Tukhtamurodov S. The concept and significance of corporate disputes: national and foreign experience Applied Jurisprudence Udc 34.