THE FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND HISTORY IN POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURE

Main Article Content

Abstract:





Postcolonial literature offers a critical forum for reexamining colonialism's effects and analyzing the past using historical and memory perspectives. The purpose of memory and history in postcolonial writings is examined in this essay, with an emphasis on how writers employ these components to provide counter-histories, contest colonial narratives, and reclaim identities. I contend that in postcolonial contexts, memory and history—while connected and distinct—are potent instruments for resistance and healing. I address how memory and history shape the postcolonial subject and how they counteract the ways in which history has been misrepresented or neglected, using examples from significant postcolonial works, including those by writers like Salman Rushdie, Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o, and Chinua Achebe.


Postcolonial literature, memory, history, colonialism, identity, counter-history, resistance.





Article Details

How to Cite:

Qahhorova , S. (2024). THE FUNCTION OF MEMORY AND HISTORY IN POSTCOLONIAL LITERATURE . Central Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Management Studies, 1(17), 141–143. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/cajmrms/article/view/41212

References:

Bhabha, H. (1994). The Location of Culture. Routledge.

Fanon, F. (1967). Black Skin, White Masks. Grove Press.

Rushdie, S. (1981). Midnight’s Children. Viking Press.

Said, E. (1993). Culture and Imperialism. Alfred A. Knopf.

Ngũgĩ wa Thiong'o. (1967). A Grain of Wheat. Heinemann.

Achebe, C. (1958). Things Fall Apart. Heinemann.

https://medium.com/the-storm-of-words-un-said/cultural-memory-and-trauma-in-postcolonial-literature-96fa0e8e9095