THE MAIN METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN AND SPOKEN ENGLISH

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

Many differences between written English and spoken English can be clearly distinguished, as there are many elements in which a clear contrast can be observed. Written English is the English that is referred to in texts and other similar material. Spoken language is what a person hears and uses to communicate with others. While both written and spoken language can be used as a means of communication, the key difference between written and spoken English is that written English is text-based and spoken English is
 not. In this article, let's look at the differences between these two types with some examples.

Ключевые слова:

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Norboevich, U. B. N. (2022). THE MAIN METHODS OF ANALYSIS OF WRITTEN AND SPOKEN ENGLISH. Евразийский журнал академических исследований, 2(2), 573–575. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejar/article/view/1174

Библиографические ссылки:

Kobrina N. A., Korneeva E. A., Ossovskaya M. I., Guzeeva K. A. Grammar of the English language. Morphology. Syntax. An English Grammar. morphology. Syntax. St. Petersburg: SOYUZ, 1999. 496 p.

Krylova I. P., Gordon E. M. A Grammar of Present-day English. Practical course. M.: Moscow State University. M. V. Lomonosov; KDU, 2017. 448 p.

Biber D., Leech G., Conrad S., Finegan E. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Essex: Pearson Education, Limited, 2003. 487 p.

Carter R., McCarthy M. Cambridge Grammar of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 973 p.

Hilliard A. Spoken Grammar and Its Role in the English Language Classroom // English Teaching Forum. 2004. No. 4. P. 2-5.

McCarthy M. Explorations in Corpus Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 56 p.

McCarthy M. Spoken Grammar: Why Is It Important? [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch? v=dR_ueIvvd84 (date of access: 01/22/2017).

McCarthy M., Carter R. Spoken Grammar: What Is It and How Can We Teach It? // ELT Journal. 1995. No. 49 (3). P. 207-218.