EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGIES IN THE EDUCATIONAL PROCESS
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
In this article highlights issues of effectiveness education and the role innovative educational technology in the training process. One of the reasons why the use of pedagogical and information technologies in the learning process is getting stronger, one of the reasons for this is that while traditional teaching has taught students to acquire only the knowledge, modern technology enables them to search for their knowledge, analyze them independently and analyze their conclusions they also teach themselves.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Borisenko I.G. (2011). Kompetentnostnyi podhod v prepodavanii nachertatel’noi geometrii i inzhenernoi grafiki [Competence approach in teaching Descriptive Geometry and Engineering Graphics]. The Bulletin of KrasGAU, 12, 302-304.
Borisenko I.G., Golovina L.N., Volodina D.N. (2014). Problemy inzhenernogo obrazovaniia. Povyshenie effektivnosti samostoiatel’noi raboty [Engineering education problems. Improving independent work efficiency]. Vestnik of Irkutsk State Technical University, 1 (84), 171-175.
Borisenko I.G. (2014). Organizatsiia uchebnogo protsessa v interaktivnoi elektronnoi obrazovatel’noi srede [Organization of educational process into an interactive electronic learning environment]. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 2 (14), 119–123.
Philipjeva S.V. (2013). Ustanovlenie urovnei sformirovannosti obshchikh i professional’nykh kompetentsii obuchaiushchikhsia uchrezhdenii nachal’nogo i srednego professional’nogo obrazovaniia v sootvetstvii s FGOS novogo pokoleniia [General and professional competence assessment among the students of primary and secondary vocational training in accordance with the demands of federal state educational standards]. Professional Education in Russia and Abroad, 1, 60-67.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Access to classroom computers. Communications of the ACM, 43(6), 24–25.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering the research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445-459. Clements, D.H., & J. Sarama. (2003).
“Strip Mining for Gold: Research and Policy in Educational Technology: A Response to ‘Fool’s Gold.’” AACE Journal, 11 (1): 7–69. Dynarski, M., Agodini, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., Emery, D., & Sussex, W. (2007).
Effectiveness of reading and mathematics software products: Findings from the first student cohort. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences. Glaubke, C. R. (2007).
The Effects of Interactive Media on Preschoolers’ Learning: A Review of the Research and Recommendations for the Future. Oakland, CA: Children Now. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246-259
Gutnick, A.L., M. Robb, L. Takeuchi, & J. Kotler. (2011). Always Connected: The New Digital Media Habits of Young Children. New York:
Hermans, R., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). The impact of primary school teachers’ educational beliefs on the classroom use of computers. Computers and Education, 51(4), 1499–1509
.Kauffman, D. F. (2004). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 139-161.
Kulik, J. A. (2003). Effects of using instructional technology in elementary and secondary schools: What controlled evaluation studies say. SRI Project Number P10446.001. Arlington, VA: SRI International.
Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2008). Generative learning: Principles and implications for making meaning. In M. J. Spector, D. M. Merrill, J. van Merrienboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research and educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group
Leu, D. J., O’Byrne, W. I., Zawlinski, L., McVerry, G., & Everett-Cacopardo, H. (2009). Expanding the new literacies conversation. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 264-269.
Lowther, D. L., Inan, F. A., Ross, S. M., & Strahl, J. D. (2012). Do one-to-one initiatives bridge the way to 21st century knowledge and skills?. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(1), 1-30
Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., Kemp, J. E., & Kalman, H. (2010). Designing effective instruction: Applications of instructional design (6th. Ed.), New York, NY: Wiley
NAEYC & Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning and Children’s Media (2012). Technology and Interactive Media as Tools in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. Joint position statement. Washington, DC: NAEYC; Latrobe, PA: Fred Rogers Center for Early Learning at Saint Vincent College
Stosic, L., & Stosic, I. (2013). Diffusion of innovation in modern school. International Journal Of Cognitive Research In Science, Engineering And Education (IJCRSEE), 1(1), 5-13.
Wang, L., Ertmer, A. P., & Newby, J. T. (2004). Increasing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 231–250.