SELECTION OF A NATIONAL METHODOLOGY BASED ON INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN CALCULATING THE LEVEL OF CONTAINERIZATION

Main Article Content

Abstract:

This article analyzes international methods used to determine the level of containerization and examines their potential application in the transport and logistics industry of Uzbekistan. The study compares the strengths and weaknesses of existing structures, especially the availability of data, the level of development of operational processes and infrastructure. One of the most important conclusions of the report is the adaptation of international methods to Uzbekistan's unique logistics system. The main conclusions indicated that, while the share of TEU and throughput efficiency are globally recognized indicators, the methodological approaches for their application in Uzbekistan need to be revisited and improved data collection systems should be implemented. The study concludes with practical recommendations for the Ministry of Transport and relevant agencies. These include testing adapted measuring instruments in logistics centers, incorporating key containerization indicators into national documents, such as the Transport Strategy until 2035, and building institutional capacity for evidence-based decision-making. In turn, the promotion of the containerization initiative in Uzbekistan will be carried out by adapting international best practices to national interests and the modern environment. This study provides accurate data for determining the level of containerization and conducting statistical analysis.

Article Details

How to Cite:

Adilova, Z., Boboyev, D., & Axmatov, N. (2026). SELECTION OF A NATIONAL METHODOLOGY BASED ON INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN CALCULATING THE LEVEL OF CONTAINERIZATION. Eurasian Journal of Academic Research, 6(2), 15–26. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejar/article/view/73632

References:

Mukhamedova, Z, Boboev, D. (2022). Research on improving the modern transport system in the process of cargo delivery. Railway transport: current issues and innovations, 3(28), 15–24.

Mukhamedova, Z., Boboyev, D., Saidivaliev, Sh., Abdullaev, R., Kobulov, J., Akhmedov, S., Fayzibayev, Sh. (2025). Mathematical modeling of fastening conditions in piggyback transport: ensuring safety and stability across different transport modes. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(8), 619. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-025-07188-7

Adilova, Z., Boboyev, D., Axtamov, N. (2024). Mathematical model of fastening conditions in container transportation taking into account various conditions. Transport bulletin, 9(30), 98-103.

Williamson, O. (1989). Transaction cost economics. Handbook of industrial organization, 1, 135-182.

Song, D. (2021). A literature review, container shipping supply chain: Planning problems and research opportunities. Logistics, 5(2), 41.

Yu, X., Tang, G., Guo, Z., Song, X., & Yu, J. (2018). Performance Comparison of Real‐Time Yard Crane Dispatching Strategies at Nontransshipment Container Terminals. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2018(1), 5401710.

Mazibuko, D., Mutombo, K., Kuroshi, L. (2024). An evaluation of the relationship between ship turnaround time and key port performance indicators: A case study of a Southern African port. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-024-00330-z

Akodia, J., Dzidonu, C., Boison, D., Kisembe, P., & Gbandi, J. (2024). The influence of the implementation of trade facilitation systems on the time required for creating delivery orders: A case study of Tema Port. World Journal of Engineering and Technology, 12, 529–539. https://doi.org/10.4236/wjet.2024.123034

Bui, V. D., & Nguyen, H. P. (2022). The role of the inland container depot system in developing a sustainable transport system. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 12(3-4), 424-443.

UzDaily. (2024, February 29). Uzbekistan and Türkiye agree to expand multimodal transport corridor. https://www.uzdaily.uz/en/uzbekistan-and-turkiye-agree-to-expand-multimodal-transport-corridor/