ПРОЦЕДУРА УРЕГУЛИРОВАНИЯ СПОРОВ В РАМКАХ ВТО
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract:
В этой статье представлена подробная информация о процедуре и процессе разрешения споров в органе по урегулированию споров Всемирной торговой организации. Также выделяются специфические особенности разрешения конфликтов в этой организации. Кроме того, обсуждаются вопросы о том, как разрешать споры в ВТО и зависимости от международных документов.
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Adekola T. A. US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism //Journal of International Trade Law and Policy. – 2019.
Creamer C. D., Godaimirska Z. (De) legitimation at the WTO dispute settlement mechanism //Vand. J. Transnat'l L. – 2016. – Т. 49. – С. 275.
Daria B., Ilya L. Eurasian economic union court and WTO dispute settlement body: Two housewives in one kitchen //Russian Law Journal. – 2019. – Т. 7. – №. 3. – С. 169-193.
Gantz D. A. An existential threat to WTO dispute settlement: blocking appointment of Appellate Body members by the United States //Arizona Legal Studies Discussion Paper. – 2018. – №. 18-26.
Grmelová N. Interpretation of the Precautionary Principle by the WTO's Dispute Settlement Body with Respect to the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Agreement //Grmelová, Nicole.(2017) Interpretation of the Precautionary Principle by the WTOs Dispute Settlement Body with Respect to the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Agreement. In. Bělohlávek AJ, Rozehnalová N.(eds.). Czech Yearbook of International Law. – 2016. – Т. 8.
Huber M., Tereposky G. The WTO Appellate Body: Viability as a Model for an Investor–State Dispute Settlement Appellate Mechanism //ICSID Review-Foreign Investment Law Journal. – 2017. – Т. 32. – №. 3. – С. 545-594.
Katz R. L. Modeling an international investment court after the World Trade Organization dispute settlement body //Harv. Negot. L. Rev. – 2016. – Т. 22. – С. 163.;
Shavkatugli, D. N. (2022). Conciliation as a Means of Adr Vs Arbitration and Mediation. European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science, 6, 430-436.
Tillaboev S. ROLE OF IP RIGHTS IN THE ASSESSMENT OF PUBLIC INTERESTS //SUSTAINABILITY OF EDUCATION, SOCIO-ECONOMIC SCIENCE THEORY. – 2023. – Т. 1. – №. 5. – С. 131-135.
Ravenhill J. (ed.). Global political economy. – Oxford University Press, 2017. P.65-67;
Reich A. The effectiveness of the WTO dispute settlement system: A statistical analysis //Transnational Commercial and Consumer Law. – Springer, Singapore, 2018. – С. 1-43.
Nurullaev F. DISPUTE SETTLEMENT PROCEDURE WITHIN WTO //Web of Scientist: International Scientific Research Journal. – 2023. – Т. 4. – №. 1. – С. 302-311.
Shaffer G., Elsig M., Puig S. The law and politics of WTO dispute settlement //Research Handbook on the Politics of International Law. – Edward Elgar Publishing, 2017. – С. 269-306.
Dilboboev, N. (2022). Issues for Enforcement of Decisions of the International Investment Arbitration on Interim Measures. Available at SSRN 4299453.
Nurullayev F. ANGLO-SAKSON HUQUQ TIZIMIDA SHARTNOMAVIY MAJBURIYATLARNING O’ZIGA XOS HUQUQIY JIHATLARI HAMDA QO’LLANILISHIDAGI HUQUQIY MUAMMOLAR //Theoretical aspects in the formation of pedagogical sciences. – 2022. – Т. 1. – №. 6. – С. 132-139.
Vidigal G. Living without the appellate body: multilateral, bilateral and plurilateral solutions to the WTO dispute settlement crisis //The Journal of World Investment & Trade. – 2019. – Т. 20. – №. 6. – С. 862-890.
Umidzhonovich N. F. PROBLEMS OF IMPROVING CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF UZBEKISTAN //E Conference Zone. – 2022. – С. 180-182.
김경화. Analysis on Structural Issues of Targeted Dumping: Focusing on US-Washing Machines (DS464) Case : дис. – 서울대학교 국제대학원, 2016.