FUNCTIONAL FEATURES OF POLYSEMY IN THE PROCESS OF TRANSLATION (UZBEK AND ENGLISH CONTEXTS)
Article Sidebar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Main Article Content
Abstract:
The present work is dedicated to the functional features of polysemy words and to the issue of translation of English polysemantic terms in different contexts. The paper presents the analysis of terms used in the literal translation. The objective of the research is to reveal the significance of correct and accurate rendering of terms for the effectiveness and accurate of intercultural professional communication. Particular attention in the paper is paid to the study of the meanings of literal terms listed in Uzbek and English languages. The authors conclude that functional features and correct translation of polysemy terms are complicated process and it should be done firstly understanding the functions of polysemy and secondly, the needs of dictionaries. Furthermore, different meanings of polysemy in contexts are analyzed in this paper.
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Abdullah, A. (2013). Cognitie semantic Analysis of Polysemous Words in English, (Iraq : University OfSulaimani-Sulaimani Faculty Of Humanities School Of Languages English Department).
Ahmanova, O.S. (1979). Lingvistika i Semiotika [Linguistics and Semiotics]. Moscow: Izd-vo MGU (in Russian).
Allan C. (2001). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics, (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Atkins C.J. (2000). Describing Polysemy. Oxford.Oxford University Press. 125 p4.
Buronov J. (1973). Comparative grammar of English and Uzbek languages. T. O’qituvchi. 138 p.
Cabré, T. (1999). Terminology: Theory, Methods and Applications. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Catford, J.C. (1978). A Linguistic Theory of Translation. An Essay in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Chesterman, A. (1997). Memes of Translation: The Spread of Ideas in Translation Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Collins English Dictionary and Thesaurus, Version 1.0. (1992). New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Hanks P. (1987). Definitions and explanations. Sinclair john. 1987 -136p.
“The history of the development of the development of Russian anthroponomy” 2022 Language education translation. ISSN: 2181-0796 VOLUME-3, ISSUE-3, 2022. St.52-61
“The origin of personal names in Russian anthroponomy” NOVATEUR PUBLICATIONS Journal NX- A Multidisciplinary Peer Reviewed Journal ISSN No: 2581 - 4230 VOLUME 9, ISSUE, Mar. -2023. St. 277-281
“Changes in the system of anthroponyms in the Uzbek language at the end of the 20th century - the beginning of the 21st century” Zien Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities ISSN NO: 2769-996X Date of Publication: 26-07-2022. St. 65-67
“Anthroponims as a means of expression national culture” SCIENTIFIC REPORTS OF BUKHARA STATE UNIVERSITY 2022/2(90) UDC: 821.161.1 St. 72-82
“Aesthetic Onomastics and Its Functions in Artistic and Intertext” International Journal on Integrated Education. e-ISSN : 2620 3502 p-ISSN : 2615 3785 Volume 4, Issue 4, April 2021. St. 132-136