ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION

Article Sidebar

Yevrosiyo ijtimoiy fanlar, falsafa va san'at jurnali
PDF (English)
Выпуск: Том 4 № 5 : Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры
Раздел: Статьи
Опубликован:
Лицензия Creative Commons

Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.

Main Article Content

Tashkent University of Applied Sciences English language faculty 3 Theoretical aspects of English Language 3 department
info@in-academy.uz

Аннотация:

This article explores the benefits of employing scaffolding techniques in teaching reading comprehension. Scaffolding involves providing structured support to students as they engage with texts, gradually fading this support as students develop their comprehension skills. The article examines key advantages of scaffolding, including gradual skill development, support for diverse learners, active engagement, building prior knowledge, promoting metacognitive awareness, fostering collaboration, and increasing confidence and motivation.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Kasimkhodjayeva , M. . (2024). ADVANTAGES OF SCAFFOLDING IN TEACHING READING COMPREHENSION. Евразийский журнал социальных наук, философии и культуры, 4(5), 163–166. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejsspc/article/view/32615

Библиографические ссылки:

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes*. Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem-solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 17(2), 89-100.

Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117-175.

Pressley, M., & Woloshyn, V. E. (1995). Cognitive strategy instruction that really improves children's academic performance. Cambridge University Press.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Erlbaum.