THE INTEGRATION OF ENGLISH IN GLOBAL EDUCATION
Article Sidebar
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
The integration of English into global education is a complex and multifaceted process. On the one hand, it serves as a powerful tool for fostering international cooperation, enhancing academic mobility, and providing students with access to global employment markets. On the other hand, it introduces challenges related to linguistic equity, cultural preservation, and access to quality English education.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
ACE. (2014). The Asian Corpus of English. Director: Andy Kirkpatrick; Researchers: Wang Lixun, John Patkin, Sophiann Subhan. Available at http://corpus.ied.edu.hk/ace/Google Scholar
Aguilar, M. & Muñoz, C. (2014). The effect of proficiency on CLIL benefits in engineering students in Spain. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Airey, J. (2011). Talking about teaching in English: Swedish university lecturers’ experiences of changing teaching language. Ibérica, 22, 35–54.Google Scholar
Albl-Mikasa, M. (2013). Express-ability in ELF communication. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 2(1), 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albl-Mikasa, M. (2015). ELF speakers’ restricted power of expression: implications for interpret-ers’ processing. In Ehrensberger-Dow, M., Englund Dimitrova, B., Hubscher Davidson, S., & Norberg, U., eds., Describing Cognitive Processes in Translation: 6. Acts and Events. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 43–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albl-Mikasa, M. (2018). ELF and translation/interpreting. In Jenkins, J., Baker, W., & Dewey, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of English as a Lingua Franca. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 369–84.Google Scholar
Ali, S. (2009). Teaching English as an international language (EIL) in the Gulf Corporation Council (GCC) countries: the brown man’s burden. In Sharifian, F., ed., English as an International Language: Perspectives and Pedagogical Issues. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, pp. 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Allwright, D. (1991). The Death of the Method. CRILE Working Paper No. 10. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, L. (2012a). Another book on EIL? In Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. New York: Routledge, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Alsagoff, L. (2012b). Identity and the EIL learner. In Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language. New York: Routledge, pp. 104–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alsagoff, L., McKay, S. L., Hu, G., & Renandya, W. A., eds., (2012). Principles and Practices of Teaching English as an International Language. Bristol: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amin, N. (1999). Minority women teachers of ESL: negotiating white English. In Braine, G., ed., Non-Native Educators in English Language Teaching. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 77–92.Google Scholar
Andon, N. & Eckerth, J. (2009). Chacun à son gout? Task-based L2 pedagogy from the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 286–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asher, J. (1977). Learning Another Language Through Actions: The Complete Teacher’s Guidebook. California: Sky Oaks Productions.Google Scholar