RAQAMLI ARBITRAJ FAOLIYATI ASOSIY BOSQICHLARINING NAZARIY-HUQUQIY TAHLILI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
To‘liq sun’iy intellektga asoslangan arbitraj tizimlari kelajakda texnik jihatdan ishlashi mumkin. Agar bunday tizimlar inson arbitrlari bilan bir xil funksiyalarni nafaqat bir xil darajada, balki samaraliroq va sifatli bajarishga qodir bo‘lsa, amaldagi qonunchilik bazasi bilan bog‘liq savollar muqarrar ravishda paydo bo‘ladi. Ushbu maqola doirasida turli yurisdiksiyalarda AI (sun’iy intellekt) arbitrlariga nisbatan joriy munosabatning tavsifi ko‘rib chiqilmaydi. Aksincha, biz AI (sun’iy intellekt) salohiyatidan foydalangan holda arbitrajlar samaradorligi va sifatini oshirish uchun qonun chiqaruvchilar hozirda yoki kelgusi yillarda duch keladigan asosiy tartibga solish muammolarini yoritib beramiz. Amaldagi qonunchilik bazasi sunʼiy intellektdan foydalanish boʻyicha keng miqyosda ishlab chiqilmagan boʻlsa-da, yurisdiksiyalar kelajakda AI (sun’iy intellekt) arbitraj tizimlari boʻyicha oʻz qoidalari bilan tajriba oʻtkazishi kutilmoqda. Ko‘rinib turibdiki, ham funksional, ham tamoyil jihatidan sun’iy intellektga asoslangan tizimlar ish tahlilini o‘tkazishi va muayyan ish bo‘yicha qaror qabul qilishi mumkin.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Bruno Manzanares Bastida “The independence and impartiality of arbitrators in international commercial arbitration”, 6 Rev. E-Mercatoria (2007), https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/5197420.pdf. Pierre lalive, on the neutrality of the arbitrator and of the place of arbitration (1984) (passim).
Uncitral model law article 12. see also yu hong-lin & laurence shore, independence, impartiality, and immunity of arbitrators — us and english perspectives, 52 international & comparative law quarterly 935 (2003).
Bakhramova, Mokhinur. "THE ROLE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF ARBITRATION AND ODR IN E-COMMERCE." International Conference on Multidimensional Research and Innovative Technological Analyses. 2022. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mokhinur-Bakhramovna/publication/359503505_THE_ROLE_AND_SIGNIFICANCE_OF_ARBITRATION_AND_ODR_IN_E-COMMERCE/links/624089bc7931cc7ccffdbdb4/THE-ROLE-AND-SIGNIFICANCE-OF-ARBITRATION-AND-ODR-IN-E-COMMERCE.pdf
IBA “Guidelines on Clonflicts of Interest in International Arbitration” (2014),https://www.ibanet.org/Publications/publications_IBA_guides_and_free_materials.aspx
UNCITRAL Model Law Article 13(3).
Horst Eidenmüller “The Rise of Robts and the Law of Humans”, Zeitschrift für Europäisches Privatrecht (ZEuP) 765, 774–776 (2017) (arguing that robots should not be granted entity status).
Bakhramova, Mokhinur. "Theoretical and Legal Regulation of ODR in the European Union Countries." European Journal of Innovation in Nonformal Education 2.1 (2022): 299-304. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mokhinur-Bakhramovna/publication/359503724_Theoretical_and_Legal_Regulation_of_ODR_in_the_European_Union_Countries/links/62408c348068956f3c522616/Theoretical-and-Legal-Regulation-of-ODR-in-the-European-Union-Countries.pdf
European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics, para. 59(f), https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html?redirect#title1.
John Armour & Horst Eidenmüller “Self-Driving Corporations”, 10 HARV. BUS. LAW. REVIEW 87 (2020)
James Hope Chapter 7: “Can a Robot be an Arbitrator?”, in Stockholm arbitration yearbook at 103, 115 (Axel Calissendorff & Patrick Schöldstrom eds. 2019).
Clout “Documents Database”, Uncitral.org, https://www.uncitral.org/clout/
Court Decisions — New York Convention, Newyorkconvention.org, http://www.newyorkconvention.org/court+decisions