A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS FOR ENHANCING ART STUDENTS' SPEAKING SKILLS

Article Sidebar

Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика
PDF (English)
Выпуск: Том 3 № 10 : Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика
Раздел: Статьи
Опубликован:

Main Article Content

Senior teacher of the National Institute of Fine Arts and Design named after Kamoliddin Bekhzod
info@in-academy.uz

Аннотация:

This article examines the effectiveness of various language teaching methods in enhancing the speaking skills of art students. While art students possess unique creative strengths, their linguistic expression can be hindered by a disconnect between visual and verbal communication. The analysis explores the benefits and limitations of traditional methods like the Direct Method and Traditional Method, alongside more contemporary approaches such as Scaffolding, Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL), and innovative techniques like Total Physical Response (TPR). The article emphasizes the need for a multi-faceted approach that leverages artistic strengths and promotes authentic communication.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Azizova , G. . (2024). A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODS FOR ENHANCING ART STUDENTS’ SPEAKING SKILLS. Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика, 3(10), 60–61. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdit/article/view/37077

Библиографические ссылки:

Asher, J. J. (1969). The total physical response approach to second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 53(1), 3-17.

Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Education.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 21(1), 8-15, 39-41.

Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Routledge.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Longman-Pearson.

Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman-Pearson.

Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2013). How languages are learned. Oxford University Press.

Nunan, D. (2003). Practical English language teaching. McGraw-Hill.

Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100.