A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CAVITY-ENHANCED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY FOR GAS DETECTION AND ANALYSIS

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

The gas sensor market is predominantly dominated by electrochemical, semiconductor, and non-dispersive infrared absorption (NDIR)-based optical sensors. While these technologies offer a broad range of detectable gases, identifying unknown gas mixtures remains a challenge, as sensor selection must be predetermined to minimize cross-talk. As an optical alternative, Raman spectroscopy provides a versatile solution, requiring no prior knowledge and covering nearly all gas compounds. However, its application is limited by a low quantum yield due to the weak scattering cross-section of gases. To address this limitation, various enhancement techniques have been explored, with cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy emerging as a promising approach. By utilizing optical cavities, this technique increases laser beam power and extends analyte interaction lengths, enabling improved detection while allowing for cost-effective instrumentation. This review examines the advancements in cavity-enhanced Raman spectroscopy, focusing on research trends, typical experimental setups, and the achieved spectral resolutions.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Malikov , M. . (2025). A BRIEF OVERVIEW OF CAVITY-ENHANCED RAMAN SPECTROSCOPY FOR GAS DETECTION AND ANALYSIS. Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика, 4(6), 38–42. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdit/article/view/45436

Библиографические ссылки:

Gebicki, J. Application of electrochemical sensors and sensor matrixes for measurement of odorous chemical compounds. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 77, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Wilson, A.D.; Baietto, M. Applications and advances in electronic-nose technologies. Sensors 2009, 9, 5099–5148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Boeker, P. On ‘electronic nose’methodology. Sen. Actuators Chem. 2014, 204, 2–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Munoz, R.; Sivret, E.C.; Parcsi, G.; Lebrero, R.; Wang, X.; Suffet, I.M.; Stuetz, R.M. Monitoring techniques for odour abatement assessment. Water Res. 2010, 44, 5129–5149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Dinh, T.V.; Choi, I.Y.; Son, Y.S.; Kim, J.C. A review on non-dispersive infrared gas sensors: Improvement of sensor detection limit and interference correction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016, 231, 529–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Hummelga, C.; Bryntse, I.; Bryzgalov, M.; Martin, H.; Norén, M.; Rödjega, H. Low-cost NDIR based sensor platform for sub-ppm gas detection. Urban Clim. 2015, 14, 342–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Gibson, D.; MacGregor, C. A Novel Solid State Non-Dispersive Infrared CO2 Gas Sensor Compatible with Wireless and Portable Deployment. Sensors 2013, 13, 7079–7103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Mendes, L.B.; Ogink, N.W.M.; Edouard, N.; Van Dooren, H.J.C.; Tinôco, I.D.F.F.; Mosquera, J. NDIR Gas Sensor for Spatial Monitoring of Carbon Dioxide Concentrations in Naturally Ventilated Livestock Buildings. Sensors 2015, 15, 11239–11257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Wang, T. Design of a six-gas NDIR gas sensor using an integrated optical gas chamber. Opt. Express 2020, 28, 11451–11462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Jacquinot, P. New developments in interference spectroscopy. Rep. Prog. Phys. 1960, 23, 267–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]