AN APPROACH TO CREATE SPEAKING ACTIVITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORAL SPEECH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

The primary aim of early foreign language learning is on development of oral skills. During learning FL Speaking is reproductive and imitative and activities focus at the production of closely supported exact output. But, formation of fluency and basic speaking competencies consign more than just producing memorized chunks of language. In other word progress in their acquisition of the target language and to become truly communicatively competent, learners also need to be able to utulize language spontaneously and creatively. This article proposes an approach to improve discursive skills in the development of oral speech.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Mamayoqubova, S., & Tohirova , M. . (2023). AN APPROACH TO CREATE SPEAKING ACTIVITIES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF ORAL SPEECH FOR YOUNG LEARNERS. Инновационные исследования в современном мире: теория и практика, 2(4), 88–92. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdit/article/view/9505

Библиографические ссылки:

Mitchell Rosamond , Jenn Hye -Won Lee . Sameness and difference in classroom learning culture: interpretations of communicative pedagogy in the UK and Korea . Language Teaching Research. (2003);7(1): 35-63. [Crossref] .

Thornbury Scott. Awareness, appropriation and autonomy .English Language Teaching Professional .2005a; 40:11-13.

.Ellis Rod . Task-based language learning and teaching . (2003); Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Ellis Rod. Task-based language teaching: sorting out the misunderstandings. International journal of Applied Linguistics . 2009; 19(3):221-246.[Crossref].

Swain Merill. The output hypothesis: just speaking and writing aren’t enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review.1993; 50(1):33-39.

Pinter Annamaria. Verbal evidence of task-related strategies: 2006;34:615-630.[Crossref].

Pinter Annamaria. Some benefits of peer-peer interaction :10-year-old children practicing with a communication task. Language Teaching Research 2007:11(2):189-207.