COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TITANIUM VS. ZIRCONIA IMPLANTS ON OSSEOINTEGRATION AND SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

A comparative evaluation of titanium and zirconia dental implants primarily examines their osseointegration capacity and soft-tissue response, both of which are key determinants of long-term implant success. Titanium, introduced in the 1960s, has remained the gold standard due to its outstanding mechanical strength, durability, and excellent biocompatibility, consistently achieving clinical success rates of 95–98%. Its proven ability to form a direct structural and functional connection with bone has established it as the primary material in implantology. Zirconia, however, has emerged as a promising metal-free alternative, especially suitable for patients seeking enhanced aesthetics or those with metal hypersensitivity. Although zirconia demonstrates favorable biocompatibility and superior aesthetics, concerns persist regarding its comparatively lower mechanical resilience.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Saparbayev, Z. . (2025). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TITANIUM VS. ZIRCONIA IMPLANTS ON OSSEOINTEGRATION AND SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE. Естественные науки в современном мире: теоретические и практические исследования, 4(14), 115–118. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdtf/article/view/66936

Библиографические ссылки:

Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.

Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, Kloss F, Gröbe A, Heiland M, Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620.

Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–184.

Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H, Gahlert M. Zirconia implants—clinical, radiographic, and histologic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(5):365–379.

Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque analysis of titanium implants with modified surfaces: an experimental study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43(2):192–201.

Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical performance of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1403–1417.

Buser D, Park W, Cochran DL, Dula K. Bone integration and implant stability: review and clinical insights. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):69–78.

Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants with different surface topography. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1993;4(6):511–516.