COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TITANIUM VS. ZIRCONIA IMPLANTS ON OSSEOINTEGRATION AND SOFT TISSUE RESPONSE
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstrak:
A comparative evaluation of titanium and zirconia dental implants primarily examines their osseointegration capacity and soft-tissue response, both of which are key determinants of long-term implant success. Titanium, introduced in the 1960s, has remained the gold standard due to its outstanding mechanical strength, durability, and excellent biocompatibility, consistently achieving clinical success rates of 95–98%. Its proven ability to form a direct structural and functional connection with bone has established it as the primary material in implantology. Zirconia, however, has emerged as a promising metal-free alternative, especially suitable for patients seeking enhanced aesthetics or those with metal hypersensitivity. Although zirconia demonstrates favorable biocompatibility and superior aesthetics, concerns persist regarding its comparatively lower mechanical resilience.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##submission.howToCite##:
##submission.citations##:
Buser D, Sennerby L, De Bruyn H. Modern implant dentistry based on osseointegration: 50 years of progress, current trends and open questions. Periodontol 2000. 2017;73(1):7–21.
Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, Kloss F, Gröbe A, Heiland M, Ebker T. Impact of dental implant surface modifications on osseointegration. BioMed Res Int. 2016;2016:6285620.
Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Effects of titanium surface topography on bone integration: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009;20(Suppl 4):172–184.
Roehling S, Schlegel KA, Woelfler H, Gahlert M. Zirconia implants—clinical, radiographic, and histologic outcomes: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(5):365–379.
Buser D, Nydegger T, Hirt HP, Cochran DL, Nolte LP. Removal torque analysis of titanium implants with modified surfaces: an experimental study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;43(2):192–201.
Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical performance of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20(7):1403–1417.
Buser D, Park W, Cochran DL, Dula K. Bone integration and implant stability: review and clinical insights. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003;18(1):69–78.
Sennerby L, Thomsen P, Ericson LE. Early tissue response to titanium implants with different surface topography. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1993;4(6):511–516.
