XALQARO ARBITRAJDA ARBITRLARNING JAVOBGARLIGI MASALASI

Article Sidebar

Yevrosiyo huquq, moliya va amaliy fanlar jurnali
PDF
Выпуск: Том 3 № 4 Part 2 : Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук
Раздел: Статьи
Опубликован:

Main Article Content

Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti magistratura bosqichi talabasi
1sindorlawyer99@gmail.com

Аннотация:

Bugungi shiddat bilan rivojlanib borayotgan dunyoda xalqaro xususiy munosabatlar alohida o’rin tutadi. Ushbu munosabatlarda vujudga keladigan nizolarni hal etishda “alternative dispute resolution” ning eng keng tarqalgan turi bo’lgan nizolarni arbitrajda hal etish ahamiyati katta hisoblanadi. Ushbu maqolada xalqaro arbitrajda arbitrlarning huquqiy holati, ularning javobgarligi masalasi muammolari va istiqbollari xalqaro arbitraj institutlarining reglamentlari hamda xorijiy mamlakatlarning arbitraj to‘g‘risidagi qonunchiligini qiyosiy tahlil qilish orqali yoritib berishga harakat qilingan.

Ключевые слова:

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Muxammadiyev, S. . (2023). XALQARO ARBITRAJDA ARBITRLARNING JAVOBGARLIGI MASALASI. Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук, 3(4 Part 2), 39–42. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/13521

Библиографические ссылки:

Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Milliy taraqqiyot yo‘limizni qat’iyat bilan davom ettirib, yangi bosqichga ko‘taramiz. – Toshkent: “O‘zbekiston” NMIU, 2017. – 427

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-4754-son qarori.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PF-60-son farmoni.

Penal code of Japan (Act № 45 of 1907). https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/PC.pdf

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new article 1, paragraph 4, as adopted in 2013)

https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media documents/uncitral/en/uncitral-arbitration-rules-2013-e.pdf

Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335, 346-47 (1871) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1841

Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1842

Ruberstein v. Otterbourg, 357 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1973) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1845 Arbitration act 1996. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/section/29