XALQARO ARBITRAJDA ARBITRLARNING JAVOBGARLIGI MASALASI

Article Sidebar

Eurasian Journal of Law, Finance and Applied Sciences
PDF (Русский)
Issue: Vol. 3 No. 4 Part 2 : Евразийский журнал права, финансов и прикладных наук
Section: Статьи
Published:

Main Article Content

Toshkent davlat yuridik universiteti magistratura bosqichi talabasi
1sindorlawyer99@gmail.com

Abstract:

Bugungi shiddat bilan rivojlanib borayotgan dunyoda xalqaro xususiy munosabatlar alohida o’rin tutadi. Ushbu munosabatlarda vujudga keladigan nizolarni hal etishda “alternative dispute resolution” ning eng keng tarqalgan turi bo’lgan nizolarni arbitrajda hal etish ahamiyati katta hisoblanadi. Ushbu maqolada xalqaro arbitrajda arbitrlarning huquqiy holati, ularning javobgarligi masalasi muammolari va istiqbollari xalqaro arbitraj institutlarining reglamentlari hamda xorijiy mamlakatlarning arbitraj to‘g‘risidagi qonunchiligini qiyosiy tahlil qilish orqali yoritib berishga harakat qilingan.

Article Details

How to Cite:

Muxammadiyev, S. . (2023). XALQARO ARBITRAJDA ARBITRLARNING JAVOBGARLIGI MASALASI. Eurasian Journal of Law, Finance and Applied Sciences, 3(4 Part 2), 39–42. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/EJLFAS/article/view/13521

References:

Mirziyoyev Sh.M. Milliy taraqqiyot yo‘limizni qat’iyat bilan davom ettirib, yangi bosqichga ko‘taramiz. – Toshkent: “O‘zbekiston” NMIU, 2017. – 427

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PQ-4754-son qarori.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining PF-60-son farmoni.

Penal code of Japan (Act № 45 of 1907). https://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/hourei/data/PC.pdf

UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (with new article 1, paragraph 4, as adopted in 2013)

https://uncitral.un.org/sites/uncitral.un.org/files/media documents/uncitral/en/uncitral-arbitration-rules-2013-e.pdf

Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. 335, 346-47 (1871) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1841

Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1842

Ruberstein v. Otterbourg, 357 N.Y.S.2d 62 (1973) in Matthew Rasmussen, Overextending Immunity: Arbitral Institutional Liability in the United States, England, and France, Fordham International Law Journal Volume 26, Issue 6 2002, pg. 1845 Arbitration act 1996. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/23/section/29