IMPROVING THE MECHANISM OF PRE-TRIAL SETTLEMENT OF CRIMINAL DISPUTES: THEORY, PRACTICE, AND COMPARATIVE-LEGAL ANALYSIS
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract:
This scholarly article examines the theoretical foundations and legal nature of pre-trial dispute resolution in criminal procedure. In particular, it explores plea bargaining (agreement on pleading guilty) and reconciliation, which are considered forms of simplified proceedings in criminal cases. The paper analyzes the regulation of these mechanisms in Uzbekistan’s national legislation (provisions of the Criminal Code and Criminal Procedure Code, statistics, and recent reforms). The strengths and weaknesses of pre-trial dispute resolution in criminal justice are discussed, and relevant scholarly opinions on plea bargaining, reconciliation, and procedural simplification are analyzed. The author offers concrete proposals for further implementation of alternative dispute resolution methods in criminal proceedings, improvement of the plea bargaining institution, as well as introduction of hybrid models such as Med-Arb (mediation-arbitration) and ENE (early neutral evaluation) in Uzbekistan.
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Ахмедова Ш.С. “Jinoyat ishida aybga iqrorlik bo‘yicha kelishuv institutini qo‘llash samaradorligi: milliy va xorijiy tajriba”. – Toshkent: Proacademy, 2023. – B. 120-130.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining 2004-yil 21-maydagi “Yarashuv to‘g‘risidagi ishlar bo‘yicha sud amaliyoti haqida” 6-son qarori (2024-yil 16-dekabrdagi o‘zgartirish va qo‘shimchalar bilan). – Xalq so‘zi, 2004, №5. – B. 76-78.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonuni, 2021-yil 18-fevral, O‘RQ–675-son “Jinoyat hamda Jinoyat-protsessual kodekslariga o‘zgartish va qo‘shimchalar kiritish to‘g‘risida”. – O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Qonun hujjatlari to‘plami, 2021, №7. – B. 120-125.
Newman D.J. “Conviction: The Determination of Guilt or Innocence without Trial”. – Little, Brown and Co., 1966. – P. 55-60.
Makarov P. “Plea Bargaining in the United States: Historical and Statistical Overview”. – Crimea Law Review, 2013, №26(1). – P. 64-66.
Toshniyozov S. “Aybga iqrorlik to‘g‘risidagi kelishuv: tushuncha va tartib”. – Yuridik fanlar axboroti (TSUL), 2022, №2. – B. 110-116.
Oripov D. Sud-huquq islohotlari jarayonida aybga iqrorlik bitimi instituti. – Adolat gazetasi, 2021-yil 10-iyun. – B. 3.
Pansatov K. “Kelishuv institutining sud amaliyotidagi o‘rni”. – Sud tizimi axborotnomasi, 2022, №1. – B. 44-46.
Нурумов Д. “Қылмыстық процессуалдық келісім: теория және практика” (Kazakh tilida). – Алматы: 2019. – Б. 212-218.
Колесник В.В. “Сделка о признании вины в уголовном процессе: равноправие сторон и дисбаланс”. – Государство и право, 2018, №5. – С. 95-100.
Халниязов Э.М. “Yarashilganligi munosabati bilan jinoiy javobgarlikdan ozod qilishni takomillashtirish masalalari”. – Ilmiy elektron jurnal, 2026, №1. – B. 50-54.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidenti Farmoni PF–37, 21.02.2024. “Yoshlar va biznesni qo‘llab-quvvatlash yili” Davlat dasturi (2024-yil uchun). – Lex.uz: ID–6811936, 78-band.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksi. 1994-yil 22-sentabr. (2023-yil 1-iyulgacha bo‘lgan o‘zgarishlar bilan).
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat-protsessual kodeksi. 1994-yil 22-sentabr. (2023-yil 1-iyulgacha bo‘lgan o‘zgarishlar bilan).
O‘zbekiston Respublikasining “Mediatsiya to‘g‘risida”gi Qonuni. 2018-yil 3-iyul, O‘RQ–482-son.
O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Sud-huquq sohasini yanada isloh qilish bo‘yicha 2021–2023 yillarga mo‘ljallangan Milliy dastur to‘g‘risida”gi PQ–5041-sonli qarori, 2021-yil 3-aprel.