FUNCTIONS OF ANTHROPONYMS IN LITERARY TEXT

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (English)
Nashr: Jild 3 Nomeri 6 : Евразийский журнал академических исследований
Bo'lim: Maqolalar
##semicolon##
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Teacher of Department of Foreign Language and Literature Faculty of Foreign Philology National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek Tashkent, Uzbekistan
madinabaymirzaeva@yandex.ru

Abstrak:

This article deals with the notion of anthroponyms, which refer to lexico-grammatical class of nouns and which are one of the most important components in lexical system of any languages. Anthroponyms cannot exist by their own, they are significative of historical development of civilization, the impact of some historical events and people, society, culture and family, thereby reflecting language picture of the world. Appearing as one of the significant inner linguistical means of text formation anthroponyms can be the key of interpretation of literary text.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

##submission.howToCite##:

Baymirzaeva, M. (2023). FUNCTIONS OF ANTHROPONYMS IN LITERARY TEXT. Yevrosiyo Ilmiy Tadqiqotlar Jurnali, 3(6), 102–104. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejar/article/view/16518

##submission.citations##:

В. К. Чичагов. Из истории русских имен отчеств и фамилий. Москва. Учпедгиз, 1959.

Виноградов В.В. О языке художественной литературы. М.: Гослитиздат, 1959.

Бестужев Лада И.В. Имя человеческое прошлое, настоящее, будущее

Лахно А.В. Имя собственное как объект сопоставительного исследования

Суперанская А.В. Общая теория имени собственного. Москва. Наука, 1973.

Якобсон Р.О. Структурализм: «за» и «против». М., 1975.

Jakobson R.O. Structuralism: “For” and “Against”. Moscow. 1975

Superanskaya A.V. General Theory of the Proper Name. Moscow. Nauka Publ. 1973

Jespersen O. “Language: Its nature, development and origin”. London: Allen & Unwin. 1922