MANIPULATION THROUGH INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Main Article Content
Abstract:
This article explores the multifaceted phenomenon of manipulation via information technologies in contemporary society. It examines how digital platforms, social media, artificial intelligence, and big data are utilized to influence public opinion, behavior, and decision-making processes. The study delves into historical contexts, psychological mechanisms, ethical implications, and real-world examples such as fake news dissemination, algorithmic biases, and cyber propaganda. Strategies for countering such manipulation, including digital literacy education, regulatory frameworks, and technological safeguards, are proposed. The article underscores the need for interdisciplinary approaches involving sociology, psychology, and law to mitigate the risks posed by these technologies while preserving their benefits for societal progress. By analyzing case studies from global events, it highlights the urgency of addressing manipulation to safeguard democratic institutions and individual autonomy.
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236.
Arendt, H. (1963). Eichmann in Jerusalem: A report on the banality of evil. Viking Press.
Bernays, E. L. (1928). Propaganda. Liveright.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. California Law Review, 107(5), 1753-1820.
European Commission. (2020). Media literacy for all: Final report of the media literacy expert group. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (2015). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(5), 993-1002.
Future of Life Institute. (2017). Asilomar AI principles. https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles/
Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press.
Human Rights Watch. (2019). Myanmar: Government Rohingya report falls short. https://www.hrw.org/news/2019/01/17/myanmar-government-rohingya-report-falls-short
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Machado, C., Kira, B., Narayanan, V., Kollanyi, B., & Howard, P. (2019). A systematic review of WhatsApp research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 16(4), 376-392.
Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.
Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.
Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy-nudge intervention. Psychological Science, 31(7), 770-780.
SEC. (2013). Report of investigation pursuant to Section 21(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: The Associated Press Twitter hack. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why today's super-connected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy—and completely unprepared for adulthood. Atria Books.
Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. PublicAffairs.

