INTERRELATION OF LANGUAGE AND CULTURE IN MODERN PHILOLOGY
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
The article explores the interrelation of language and culture as a central issue in modern philology. It examines how language functions not only as a means of communication but also as a carrier of cultural values, collective memory, and social norms. Special attention is given to the ways cultural context influences linguistic structures, meanings, and discourse practices, as well as how language, in turn, shapes cultural identity and worldview. The study draws on contemporary linguistic theories, including cultural linguistics, sociolinguistics, and discourse analysis, to demonstrate the dynamic and reciprocal nature of language–culture interaction. The article emphasizes the relevance of this interdependence for modern philological research, intercultural communication, and language education.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Humboldt, W. von. (1988). On Language: The Diversity of Human Language-Structure and Its Influence on the Mental Development of Mankind. Cambridge University Press.
Sapir, E. (1921). Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. Harcourt, Brace & Company.
Whorf, B. L. (1956). Language, Thought, and Reality: Selected Writings. MIT Press.
Cassirer, E. (1944). An Essay on Man. Yale University Press.Cultural Linguistics and Linguoculturology
Sharifian, F. (2017). Cultural Linguistics: Cultural Conceptualisations and Language. John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. (1992). Semantics, Culture, and Cognition. Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2014). Words and Meanings: Lexical Semantics Across Domains, Languages, and Cultures. Oxford University Press.
Palmer, G. B. (1996). Toward a Theory of Cultural Linguistics. University of Texas Press.Sociolinguistics and Discourse Analysis
Wardhaugh, R., & Fuller, J. M. (2015). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (7th ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and Culture. Oxford University Press.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The Sociolinguistics of Globalization. Cambridge University Press.
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic Anthropology. Cambridge University Press.
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge University Press Psycholinguistics and Linguistic Relativity (Statistical Evidence)
Lucy, J. A. (1997). Linguistic relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26, 291–312.
Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Cognitive Psychology, 43(1), 1–22.
Regier, T., Kay, P., & Khetarpal, N. (2007). Color naming and the shape of color space. Language, 83(4), 884–917.
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge University Press Corpus Linguistics and Quantitative Methods
McEnery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Biber, D., Conrad, S., & Reppen, R. (1998). Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use. Cambridge University Press.
Gries, S. T. (2009). Statistics for Linguistics with R. De Gruyter.Pragmatics and Politeness Theory
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge University Press.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. Oxford University Press.Globalization, Digital Discourse, and Predictive Trends
Crystal, D. (2006). Language and the Internet (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Mediatization and sociolinguistic change. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 18(2), 242–254.
Statista Research Department. (2023). Global Internet and Social Media Usage Statistics.UNESCO. (2022). World Languages Report.Computational Linguistics and Predictive Modeling.
Jurafsky, D., & Martin, J. H. (2023). Speech and Language Processing (3rd ed.). Pearson.
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU. Proceedings of ACL.
Navigli, R. (2018). Natural language understanding. ACM Computing Surveys, 51(2).