HUQUQIY MASLAHATCHI CHATBOTLAR VA ULARNING IMKONIYATLARI
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract:
Raqamli transformatsiya jarayonining tezlashuvi natijasida yuridik xizmatlar sohasida sun’iy intellektga asoslangan texnologiyalar, xususan huquqiy maslahatchi chatbotlar keng qo’llanila boshladi. Sun’iy intellektga asoslangan huquqiy maslahatchi chatbotlar bugungi kunda yuridik xizmatlar sohasi uchun eng dolzarb innovatsion vositalardan biridir. Ular aholining huquqiy savollariga qisqa vaqt ichida javob berish, normativ-huquqiy hujjatlarni izohlash, dastlabki maslahatlar taqdim etish orqali huquqiy ongni rivojlantirishga katta yordam bermoqda. Yuridik xizmatlarning qimmatligi yoki hududiy cheklovlar tufayli advokat xizmatidan foydalana olmaydigan fuqarolar uchun chatbotlar adolatga kirish imkoniyatlarini kengaytiradi. Ushbu maqola O‘zbekiston qonunchiligi nuqtai nazarida huquqiy
chatbotlarning maqomi, ulardan foydalanishdagi cheklovlar, xavf-xatarlar, normativ-huquqiy javobgarlik masalalari hamda kelajak istiqbollarini ilmiy asosda tahlil qiladi. Tadqiqot davomida solishtirma-huquqiy metod, kontent-analiz, normativ sharh va case-study usullari qo‘llanildi. Natijalar orqali huquqiy chatbotlar yuridik xizmatlar bozorida samaradorlikni oshirishi, biroq ushbu faoliyatni huquqiy tartibga solishning zarurligi aniqlangan
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Amropali Shetty. (2024). Chatbots vs Virtual Assistants.
Chatbot. (2024). Vikipediya.
European Legal Tech Association. (2023). LegalTech Report.
Karimova, D. (2023). Raqamli adliya:O‘zbekiston tajribasi.
Kuvandikov, Z. O. (2022). Sun'iy intellekt va huquq.
Google DeepMind. (2016). AlphaGo.
Legalclinic.uz. (2024). Sun’iy intellekt va huquq masalalari.
lex.uz – O‘zbekiston qonunchilik ma’lumotlari milliy bazasi.
Inoyatov N. (2025) Zamonaviy yurist uchun “Legal Tech” vositalari. 52-54 betlar
Araujo, T. (2018). Living up to the chatbot hype: The influence of anthropomorphic design cues and communicative agency framing on conversational agent and company perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 85, 183–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.03.051
Bender, E. M., & Koller, A. (2020). Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the ACL, 5185–5198. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463
Cabitza, F., Locoro, A., & Simonetta, M. (2020). Simulacrums of explanation: Towards the epistemic evaluation of explainable AI. Behaviour & Information Technology, 39(7), 711–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1685808
De Mauro, A., Greco, M., & Grimaldi, M. (2021). AI-based legal chatbots: An analysis framework for evaluating performance in legal advice. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 19(4), 597–612. https://doi.org/10.1108/JICES-01-2021-0012
Floridi, L. (2019). Establishing the rules for building trustworthy AI. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1(6), 261–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0055-y
Westlaw Editorial Staff. (2023). DoNotPay and the Unauthorized Practice of Law: Case summaries and legal analysis. Westlaw Edge Legal Database. Retrieved from https://legal.thomsonreuters.com/en/westlaw
LexisNexis Editorial Team. (2024). AI legal advisory systems: Risk, opportunity, and regulatory frameworks. LexisNexis Legal Technology Insights. Retrieved from https://www.lexisnexis.com
Hancock, J. T., Naaman, M., & Levy, K. (2020). AI