MODALLIKNING NAZARIY ASOSLARI VA UNING FALSAFIY, MANTIQIY, TILSHUNOSLIK NUQTAYI NAZARIDAN TAHLILI

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

Ushbu maqola modallik tushunchasining nazariy asoslarini o‘rganishga bag‘ishlangan. Maqolada modallikning falsafiy, mantiqiy va lingvistik kategoriyalar sifatida rivojlanishi, uning tarixiy asoslari va zamonaviy yondashuvlari muhokama qilinadi. Modallikning epistemik, deontik va dinamik turlari o‘rtasidagi farqlar tahlil qilinib, ularning subyektiv va obyektiv xususiyatlari ko‘rsatib beriladi. Xususan, epistemik modallikning bilim, e’tiqod va taxminlarga asoslangan fikrlar bilan bog‘liqligi, shuningdek, ijtimoiy va madaniy omillar ta’siri o‘rganiladi. Maqolada Aristotel va I.Kantning modallikka oid nazariyalari, shuningdek, zamonaviy lingvistik tadqiqotlarning, jumladan, Palmer, Lyons va Hallidey tomonidan ilgari surilgan qarashlar tahlil qilinadi.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Turakulova, D. . (2024). MODALLIKNING NAZARIY ASOSLARI VA UNING FALSAFIY, MANTIQIY, TILSHUNOSLIK NUQTAYI NAZARIDAN TAHLILI. Наука и технология в современном мире, 3(13), 80–82. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdift/article/view/41320

Библиографические ссылки:

Bybee, J., Perkins, R., & Pagliuca, W. (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Coates, J. (1983). The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (3rded.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kant, I. (1998). Critique of Pure Reason. Translated by P. Guyer & A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics (Vol. 2). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nuyts, J. (2000). Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.

Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality (2nded.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.