THE ROLE OF PROGRESSIVE LEARNING TECHNIQUES IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES IN MODERN EDUCATION
Main Article Content
Аннотация:
This thesis explores the significance of progressive learning techniques in the field of foreign language education in contemporary academic settings. Progressive learning approaches, which emphasize student-centered teaching, experiential activities, and technology integration, have gained prominence in modern education systems worldwide. The study analyzes the effectiveness of techniques such as task-based learning, collaborative learning, project-based learning, and digital tools integration in enhancing learners’ linguistic skills. Findings indicate that progressive methodologies foster motivation, critical thinking, and communicative competence among students, ultimately contributing to higher levels of language acquisition.
Article Details
Как цитировать:
Библиографические ссылки:
Richards, J.C. & Rodgers, T.S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 45-78.
Ellis, R. (2016). Task-Based Language Learning and Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 102-135.
Larsen-Freeman, D. & Anderson, M. (2013). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 56-89.
Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press. pp. 88-120.
Willis, J. (2012). A Framework for Task-Based Learning. London: Longman. pp. 22-65.
Nunan, D. (2015). Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. Routledge. pp. 77-109.
Oxford, R.L. (2011). Teaching and Researching Language Learning Strategies. Pearson Education. pp. 134-165.
Brown, H.D. (2014). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. Pearson Education. pp. 145-178.
Thomas, J.W. (2000). A Review of Research on Project-Based Learning. San Rafael, CA: The Autodesk Foundation. pp. 10-45.
Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Emerging Technologies: Language Learning in the Digital Age. Language Learning & Technology, 22(3), pp. 1-18.
