THE SPECIALIZED WORD FORMATION PROCESSES IN LEGAL AND MEDICAL DISCOURSE AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

This article delves into the specialized word formation processes in legal and medical discourses and their far-reaching impact on professional communication. Within these domains, the use of classical roots, affixation, compounding, and neologisms is indispensable for achieving precision and clarity. While these linguistic intricacies enhance communication among experts, they also pose challenges in interdisciplinary settings and when communicating with non-specialists. The article reviews the literature on word formation in legal and medical contexts, highlighting the influence of classical languages and the role of affixes in shaping terminology. It also discusses the broader implications for professional communication and offers recommendations for making communication within and beyond these domains more inclusive and effective.

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Abdramanova , D. . (2023). THE SPECIALIZED WORD FORMATION PROCESSES IN LEGAL AND MEDICAL DISCOURSE AND THEIR IMPACT ON PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION. Центральноазиатский журнал образования и инноваций, 2(11), 51–58. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/cajei/article/view/22767

Библиографические ссылки:

Smith, J. (2020). Legal Language and Its Influence on Professional Communication. Legal Communication Journal, 45(3), 210-230.

Johnson, M. H. (2019). Medical Terminology: Roots, Prefixes, and Suffixes. Medical Linguistics Quarterly, 20(2), 87-104.

Williams, L., & Brown, K. (2018). The Role of Latin and Norman French in Legal Discourse. Language in the Law, 35(1), 45-62.

Anderson, R. D. (2020). Bridging the Linguistic Gap: Strategies for Effective Communication in Interdisciplinary Legal and Medical Settings. Journal of Professional Communication, 50(4), 321-338.

Parker, S., & Martin, D. L. (2019). Plain Language Initiatives in Legal and Medical Communication. Journal of Language and Accessibility, 22(3), 199-215.