JINOYAT-PROTSESSUAL QONUNCHILIKDA AYBLOVNI O‘ZGARTIRISH VA TUGATISH INSTITUTINI RIVOJLANTIRISH ISTIQBOLLARI

Article Sidebar

PDF (Русский)
Issue: Vol. 3 No. 36 : Science and Innovation
Section: Articles
Published:

Main Article Content

Berdaq nomidagi Qoraqalpoq davlat universiteti mustaqil izlanuvchisi
u_keulimjay@karsu.uz

Abstract:

Ushbu tezisda jinoyat-protsessual huquqda ayblovni o‘zgartirish va tugatish institutining nazariy-huquqiy mazmuni hamda uning rivojlantirish istiqbollari tahlil qilinadi. Xalqaro tajriba misolida sud nazorati, himoya huquqlarini kafolatlash va adolatli sudlov tamoyillarining qo‘llanilishi ko‘rib chiqiladi. Shuningdek, O‘zbekiston Respublikasining amaldagi qonunchiligi va sud-tergov amaliyotida mavjud muammolar yoritilib, ularni bartaraf etish bo‘yicha takliflar ilgari suriladi. Tezis jinoyat-protsessual qonunchilikni takomillashtirish va adolatli sudlov tamoyillarini amalda ta’minlash uchun ilmiy-amaliy ahamiyat kasb etadi.

Article Details

How to Cite:

Uteniyazov , K. . (2025). JINOYAT-PROTSESSUAL QONUNCHILIKDA AYBLOVNI O‘ZGARTIRISH VA TUGATISH INSTITUTINI RIVOJLANTIRISH ISTIQBOLLARI. Science and Innovation, 3(36), 6–9. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/si/article/view/61043

References:

Strafprozessordnung (StPO) der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, § 265

Criminal Procedure Rules of England and Wales, Part 14 (Amendment of indictment). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/1610/part/14/made

U.S. Supreme Court, Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212 (1960). https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/361/212/

Code de procédure pénale (CPP), Articles 79–189. https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/texte_lc/LEGITEXT000006071154/

Codice di procedura penale, Italia, Art. 516–522. https://www.altalex.com/documents/codici-altalex/2014/10/30/codice-di-procedura-penale

Keiji shohō (Japanese Code of Criminal Procedure), 1948, Articles 312–318. https://www.japaneselawtranslation.go.jp/en/laws/view/2056/en