TIL O‘QITISHDA NEYROLINGVISTIKA VA KOGNITIV PRAGMATIKA INTEGRATSIYASI: NEYROMETODIK YONDASHUV SARI
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstrak:
ushbu maqola neyrolingvistika va kognitiv pragmatika integratsiyasi asosida til o‘rgatishning neyrometodik modelini taklif etadi. Unda pragmatik kompetensiyaning miyada qanday shakllanishi, xususan ijrovi funksiyalar, mentalizatsiya va kontekstual modellashtirish orqali yuzaga kelishi tahlil qilinadi. O‘zbek va ingliz tillari misolida olib borilgan taqqoslama natijalar bilingvlarda yuqori kognitiv yuklama va frontal aktivlikni ko‘rsatadi. Topilmalar individual neyroprofilga mos ta’lim strategiyalarini ishlab chiqish zarurligini ko‘rsatadi.
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
##submission.howToCite##:
##submission.citations##:
Bambini, V., & Bara, B. G. (2012). Neuropragmatics. In The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Bosco, F. M., Parola, A., Valentini, M. C., & Morese, R. (2017). Neural correlates underlying the comprehension of deceitful and ironic communicative intentions. Cortex, 94, 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.007
Ferstl, E. C., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2001). The role of coherence and cohesion in text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 11(3), 325–340.
Gernsbacher, M. A., & Robertson, R. R. W. (2005). Reading comprehension and the brain: A functional analysis. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (pp. 1–10). Guilford Press.
Giora, R. (2003). On our mind: Salience, context, and figurative language. Oxford University Press.
Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59.
Martin, I., & McDonald, S. (2003). Weak coherence, no theory of mind, or executive dysfunction? Solving the puzzle of pragmatic language disorders. Brain and Language, 85(3), 451–466.
