REREADING ASSESSMENT IN A DIGITAL AGE

Main Article Content

Аннотация:

There are cases where a reader who performs well offline appears to perform poorly online, and vice versa. In other words, we can no longer expect that a standardized test of a student's offline reading comprehension ability (ORCA) will accurately measure the important abilities that affect their performance in online reading.

Ключевые слова:

Article Details

Как цитировать:

Ochilova, V. (2022). REREADING ASSESSMENT IN A DIGITAL AGE. Педагогика и психология в современном мире: теоретические и практические исследования, 1(24), 35–39. извлечено от https://in-academy.uz/index.php/zdpp/article/view/4459

Библиографические ссылки:

Dejica, Daniel, Gyde Hansen, Peter Sandrini, Iulia Para (eds.). 2016. Language in the Digital Era. Challenges and Perspectives. Warsaw and Berlin: DeGruyter.

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education:Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5-25.

Brookhart, S. (2010). Mixing it up: Combing sources of classroom achievement information for formative and summative purposes. In H. Andrade & Y. G. Cizek (Eds). Handbook of formative assessment (pp. 279-296). New York, NY: Routledge.

Brookhart, S. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 30(1), 3-12.

Chappuis, J. (2009). Seven strategies of assessment for learning. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.

Chappuis J., & Chapppuis, S. (2002). Understanding school assessment: A parents and community guide to helping students learn. Portland, OR: Assessment Training Institute.