DEVELOPING LEARNERS’ AUTONOMY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES

Main Article Content

Abstract:

The article explores the development of students’ independent study skills as a key component of modern education systems. It highlights how globalization, digitalization, and lifelong learning require learners to become self-regulated, motivated, and reflective. Drawing on theories by Zimmerman, Pintrich, and Deci & Ryan, the study emphasizes planning, strategy use, and feedback as essential elements of self-regulated learning. Through a comparative analysis of educational practices in the United Kingdom, Finland, Singapore, Australia, the United States, and Uzbekistan, the paper identifies shared strategies such as explicit instruction, formative assessment, and technology-enhanced learning environments. The research underscores that independent learning flourishes when autonomy is balanced with structure and supported by institutional frameworks. Uzbekistan’s current reforms are discussed within this global context, showing progress toward integrating international best practices. Ultimately, the article concludes that fostering independence requires deliberate design, teacher guidance, and consistent policy support for lifelong learning.

Article Details

How to Cite:

Muzaffarova, M. . (2025). DEVELOPING LEARNERS’ AUTONOMY IN HIGHER EDUCATION: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES. Eurasian Journal of Social Sciences, Philosophy and Culture, 5(10), 116–123. Retrieved from https://in-academy.uz/index.php/ejsspc/article/view/62699

References:

Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2021). Self‐regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Cambridge University Press.

Candy, P. C. (2020). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide to theory and practice. Jossey-Bass.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325.

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4–58.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2021). The power of feedback revisited. Educational Research Review, 14(2), 101–118.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

Jivet, I., Scheffel, M., Drachsler, H., & Specht, M. (2018). Awareness is not enough: Pitfalls of learning analytics dashboards in the educational practice. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 1189–1208.

Kamariddinovna, M. E. (2024). The role of web resources in formation of the future English teachers’ professional competence. American Journal of Pedagogical and Educational Research, 29, 57–69.

Kamariddinovna, M.E. (2025). THE APPLICATION OF DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES IN TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGES. Hamkor konferensiyalar, 1(14), 21-25.

Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2018). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2016). A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in mathematics. Computers & Education, 100, 126–140.

Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K–12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 15(1), 1–23.

Ng, W. (2021). New digital literacies for learning: 21st century teaching and learning skills. Routledge.

OECD. (2019). Trends shaping education 2019. OECD Publishing.

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 422.

Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385–407.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Self-determination theory: An approach to human motivation and personality. Guilford Publications.

Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 101832.

Thomas, J. W. (2020). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2013). From cognitive modeling to self-regulation: A social cognitive career path. Educational Psychologist, 48(3), 135–147.

Мойдинова, Э. (2024). Analysis of the implementation of a webquest in teaching students. Актуальные вопросы языковой подготовки в глобализирующемся мире, 1(1).