FREEDOM, RESPONSIBILITY, AND DIGNITY IN A ALGORITIMIZED SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT
Main Article Content
Abstract:
Algorithmization of the social environment describes the state in which algorithmic systems cease to be external tools and begin to function as structural elements of the social order. The problem is that such normativity acts imperceptibly: it neither prohibits nor formulates norms, but rather designs the "structure of the possible," making some trajectories of behavior probable and visible, while others are unlikely. The purpose of the article is to reconstruct, based on the conceptual description of algorithmized sociality, how freedom, responsibility, and dignity are re-formulated in these conditions. The method is theoretical-analytical: clarifying terms, restoring the logic of transitions, and highlighting differences. It is shown that freedom shifts from autonomy to the ability to distinguish between what is possible and what is proposed and to hold a pause, responsibility dissipates in the mode of delegated decisions and requires understanding as an ethical trace of participation, dignity becomes the limit of instrumentalization and is associated with the right to non-transparency, error, and non-conformity of the model.
Article Details
How to Cite:
References:
Иванов Д. В.; Асочаков Ю. В. (Ivanov D.V.; Asochakov Y.V.). 2023. «Цифровизация и критическая теория общества» (Digitalization and Critical Theory of Society). Социологические исследования. (Sociological Studies), № 6, с. 16–28. DOI: 10.31857/S013216250024389-0 (дата обращения: 13.01.2026)
Йеунг, Карен (Yeung, Karen). 2017. ‘Hypernudge’: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1): 118–136. DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713. (дата обращения: 10.02.2026)
Рувруа А., Бернс Т. Algorithmic Governmentality and Prospects of Emancipation: Disparateness as a Precondition for Individuation through Relationships? // Réseaux. – 2013. – № 177(1). – P. 163–196. – https://doi.org/10.3917/res.177.0163 (дата обращения: 1.02.2026)
Эслами М., Рикман А., Ваккаро К. и др. “I always assumed that I wasn't really that close to [her]”: Reasoning about invisible algorithms in news feeds // CHI 2015 – Proceedings of the 33rd Annual CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. – ACM, 2015. – P. 153–162. – DOI: 10.1145/2702123.2702556. – URL: https://www-personal.umich.edu/~csandvig/research/Eslami_Algorithms_CHI15.pdf (дата обращения: 8.02.2026).
Barad K. Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter // Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 2003. Vol. 28, No. 3. P. 801–831. DOI: 10.1086/345321. URL: https://doi.org/10.1086/345321 (дата обращения: 10.02.2026)
Zuboff S. Big other: surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization // Journal of Information Technology. 2015. Vol. 30. P. 75–89. DOI: 10.1057/jit.2015.5. URL: https://edshare.soton.ac.uk/id/document/289051 (дата обращения: 1.02.2026)
Hallinan B., Striphas T. Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture // New Media & Society. 2016. Vol. 18, No. 1. P. 117–137. DOI: 10.1177/1461444814538646. URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814538646 (дата обращения: 15.01.2026)
Weinmann, M., Schneider, C., vom Brocke, J. Digital Nudging. Business & Information Systems Engineering. 2016. Vol. 58. P. 433–436. DOI: 10.1007/s12599-016-0453-1. (дата обращения: 15.01.2026)
Nissenbaum H. Accountability in a Computerized Society // Science and Engineering Ethics. 1996. Vol. 2. P. 25–42. DOI: 10.1007/BF02639315. URL: https://nissenbaum.tech.cornell.edu/papers/accountability.pdf (дата обращения: 8.02.2026).

