Some words in a language, when used together within a word combination without change, begin to acquire a specific meaning or concept. Over time, such a combination of words—or a meaningful word with an auxiliary word, or even a phraseological expression—may develop into a single, unified word. The emergence of new words in this way is referred to as the lexico-syntactic method of word formation.

This article shows three methods of studying the meanings of words – reference theory, component analysis and postulates of
meaning based on the analysis of different examples. In the process of translation, the fact that the translator does not understand the meaning of the word in the context of the original language, but the meaning of the word itself, causes problems such as the wrong translation of this word in the translation. It is this research that helps to overcome such a problem. The following results are presented in the research: reference theory cannot give the full meaning of the word, it is used together with the component analysis, the two analysis methods cannot give the meaning of the word in the context. The third - the method of analysis of meaning forms can determine the pragmatic and semantic features of the word, and this is convenient for the translator.

This article explores the distinction between fixed and free word combinations within the study of phraseology. Fixed word combinations, such as idioms and proverbs, are characterized by their rigid structure and non-compositional meanings, whereas free word combinations exhibit greater syntactic flexibility and transparency of meaning. The study utilizes a descriptive and comparative methodology, analyzing linguistic corpora from both spoken and written texts to identify the structural and functional differences between these two categories of word combinations. The results highlight the cognitive processes involved in the use and comprehension of fixed and free expressions, underscoring their respective roles in both native and second language acquisition. This research provides valuable insights into the importance of understanding these distinctions for linguistic theory and language learning.

This thesis discusses the types of word formation in the modern German language and the ways in which they are formed. Word formation is one of the key ways to expand the lexical composition of the language and establish relationships between different parts of speech. By studying word formation as a process of creating new derivatives, it is possible to determine the influence of human creative activity on the activation of unproductive models, the creation of new derivational elements, and the creation of different types of word creation.

At first glance, it may seem that Fitrat revives the meaning of the word "art", the essence of art. What are the meanings of the word "good"? In fact, the word "art" used in our language has a wide range of meanings. For example, the word "art" has different meanings in each of the combinations such as "art of painting", "to master the art of pottery", "made with high art". Nevertheless, they have common points that unite the facets of meaning expressed by the word "art", which is that this word is related to the concepts of "beauty", "skill", "taste" in all three cases.

One of the poets who pays special attention to the power of the word in artistic creation, its emotional-expressive character, and its ability to fulfill a poetic task is Eshqobil Shukur. In writing poetry, he uses the word not only as a means of expressing thought, but also seeks to find the possibilities of giving each word its aesthetic content, giving it a new spirit.

Word order plays a crucial role in sentence structure, meaning, and clarity in any language. English and Uzbek differ significantly in this aspect: English and Uzbek differ significantly in word order: English follows SVO, while Uzbek primarily uses SOV. This difference influences sentence formation and emphasis. These differences affect emphasis, sentence interpretation, and overall communication strategies. In English, altering word order can lead to ungrammatical sentences or change the intended meaning. In contrast, Uzbek allows for greater flexibility, enabling speakers to shift emphasis without losing grammatical correctness. This paper explores the fundamental differences between English and Uzbek word order, examining their impact on sentence formation, emphasis, and question structures. Understanding these distinctions is essential for linguists, translators, and language learners seeking to master both languages.

This thesis analyzes the utilize of inductive vocabularies in instructing lexicon with the assistance of collogations. When a word that's an component of a field is utilized by a speaker or gotten by a audience, it is encompassed by other words in that field, a complete picture of that word. for us to make, not a single word is cleared out out of the field. Each word taken independently is justifiable as it were as a entirety, and as it were on the premise of this complex can the meaning of the word be caught on.

The phenomenon of homonymy, which is described by the perfect or partial matching of linguistic units in the language, is one of the characteristics shared by the Uzbek and German languages.  The primary unit of a language's vocabulary and the focus of lexicology study is the word.  current linguistics word descriptions.  the primary word symbols in contemporary German.  The definition of the word according to conventional logic and linguistics.  The word's lexical meaning and its several forms.  The semantic structure of the word.  Polysemy as a typical phenomenon in modern German.  In this article, the comparative typology of German-Uzbek mants based on Hermann Hesse's desert wolf is discussed.

Word formation plays a crucial role in the dynamic evolution of the English language, facilitating communication by enriching its vocabulary. This process, which includes affixation, compounding, conversion, and blending, enables the creation of new words to meet the needs of modern communication. Understanding word formation processes not only enhances linguistic competence but also improves language learning and usage. This article examines the various types of word formation, their significance, and their impact on the development of English.

This paper presents a comparative study of word formation processes in English and Uzbek, focusing on morphological structures, types of word formation, and the productivity of each process in both languages. While English is an analytic language with a tendency toward affixation and compounding, Uzbek is an agglutinative language that extensively employs affixation, especially suffixation, to create new words. The study highlights similarities, differences, and the cultural and historical influences that have shaped the development of word formation mechanisms in both languages..

This article explores contemporary approaches to English morphology with a particular focus on the theory of parts of speech in modern linguistic study. It examines how structural, semantic, and functional frameworks classify English word classes, highlighting their strengths and limitations. The discussion emphasizes the role of morphological markers, syntactic distribution, and semantic properties in defining major and minor parts of speech. Attention is also given to how modern linguistics integrates cognitive and usage-based perspectives to explain word-class flexibility, category shifts, and borderline cases. By synthesizing traditional and modern viewpoints, the article provides a comprehensive overview of how English morphology contributes to understanding grammatical structure, lexical organization, and the dynamic nature of word classification in contemporary English.

Word formation plays a key role in linguistic structure and lexical growth. This study compares English and Turkish, focusing on how each language forms new words. English, as an analytic language, uses derivation, compounding, blending, and clipping, while Turkish, as an agglutinative language, relies mainly on suffixation and vowel harmony. The analysis highlights that English word creation is flexible and often irregular, whereas Turkish shows systematic and transparent morphological patterns. Historical and sociolinguistic factors have also shaped innovation in both languages.

Comparing noun formation by affixation in English and Karakalpak can provide insights into the similarities and differences between these two languages. Affixation is the process of adding prefixes or suffixes to a root word to create a new word with a different meaning. That's why, the article presents the comparative study of noun formation by affixation method in english and karakalpak languages.

There are many ways to organize the imagery of a literary text. As you know, the language of fiction is endless. Synonyms, homonyms, and antonyms are used effectively in the process of creating an artistic image, just as words that are specific to all forms of common lexical layers are used effectively in the process of creating an artistic image. In the use of word variants, as well as in the use of various word forms and expressions, it is possible to observe a general situation peculiar to the language of the work of art

The article examines the most productive word formation processes in Modern English, including affixation, compounding, conversion, clipping, blending, and acronym formation. It explores how these mechanisms contribute to vocabulary expansion and reflect social, technological, and cultural changes in contemporary English usage. Special attention is given to neologisms and the influence of globalization and digital communication on lexical innovation. The study emphasizes the dynamic nature of the English lexicon and the role of word formation in adapting to the needs of modern speakers.

Through this article, the study of word formation in linguistics and its influence on occasionalism have been studied. Also, the types of derivation, the role of derivation in the formation of occasional words were studied.

This article is devoted to the relationship between the form and meaning of a word, in which the meaning of a word and its relationship with the form are analyzed. General conclusions are presented based on the emergence of the nomination process and the views on this phenomenon in world and Uzbek linguistics. Special attention is paid to the importance of form in nomination.

This paper presents a comparative study of word formation processes in English and Uzbek, focusing on morphological structures, types of word formation, and the productivity of each process in both languages. While English is an analytic language with a tendency toward affixation and compounding, Uzbek is an agglutinative language that extensively employs affixation, especially suffixation, to create new words. The study highlights similarities, differences, and the cultural and historical influences that have shaped the development of word formation mechanisms in both languages.

This literature review explores the principles of word group formation in the Uzbek language, a key member of the Turkic language family. It delves into the phonetic, morphological, syntactic, and semantic aspects of Uzbek word groups, drawing on a range of scholarly studies. The review highlights the diversity within Uzbek dialects and examines the language's unique features through comparative analysis with other Turkic languages. The findings reveal the intricate interplay between linguistic elements and cultural influences, underscoring the complexity and richness of the Uzbek language. The review also discusses the implications of these findings for language learning, teaching, and preservation, providing valuable insights into the linguistic structure and cultural context of Uzbek.

This article explores the characteristics of vocabulary and the processes by which words change their meaning over time. It examines the historical, social, and cultural factors influencing word semantics, providing examples from classical and modern lexicology. Particular attention is paid to Russian and international scholars who have studied changes in word meaning, as well as the mechanisms that allow language to remain vibrant and dynamic.

This article explores the concepts of word-formation and word structure in the English language. It analyzes the main types of word-formation processes such as derivation, compounding, conversion, and blending. Additionally, the internal structure of words is examined, focusing on morphemes, roots, prefixes, and suffixes. The article highlights the significance of understanding word formation for language learning and linguistic analysis.

This article explores issues related to the phenomenon of lexical archaism and the linguistic interpretation of lexical archaisms of the Uzbek language, lexicographic description, semantic classification. Also described are archaism, lexeme archaism, semema archaism, historism, linguistic features within the framework of historical word concepts, commonalities and particularities in relations. Opinions were made on the types, classification of archaism, the causes and factors of their occurrence, methodological features.

The purpose of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the syntactic structures of the Russian and English languages with an emphasis on word order in the sentence. We will consider the main features of each language system, analyze their similarities and differences, as well as discuss how these characteristics influence the translation and study of languages. The article provides information about the rules of word order in English and Russian sentences, as well as examples of using different structures. In conclusion, the results of the comparative analysis will be summarized with an emphasis on the importance of word order as an important aspect of syntax that influences the understanding and expressiveness of the language.

This article deals with the importance of word choice from the range  of  synonyms  in  media  texts.  The  semantic  nature  of words is analyzed as the key factors of creation of media texts. The choice of words for publicist style is studied from the point of view of linguistics.